From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42777: 28.0.50; Obsolete eldoc-message function used in CEDET Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 19:22:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87zh69pdb8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874kpbetd6.fsf@gnus.org> <87sgc69zaz.fsf@gmail.com> <87wo1gs0tw.fsf@gnus.org> <87k0xgs0ay.fsf@gnus.org> <87d038i566.fsf@gmail.com> <87blisrvb1.fsf@gnus.org> <877dtgruku.fsf@gnus.org> <874kokhrbb.fsf@gmail.com> <87wo1dd1p3.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18348"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 42777@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 01 20:23:10 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kDAw1-0004eA-Sx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 20:23:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47732 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDAw0-0001ct-CY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 14:23:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDAvu-0001cm-P9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 14:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45703) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDAvu-0006bW-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 14:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDAvu-0003HL-8f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 14:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2020 18:23:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42777 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 42777-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42777.159898455312551 (code B ref 42777); Tue, 01 Sep 2020 18:23:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42777) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Sep 2020 18:22:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57249 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDAvQ-0003GN-PQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 14:22:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f54.google.com ([209.85.128.54]:54350) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kDAvN-0003G6-Gt for 42777@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 14:22:31 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f54.google.com with SMTP id s13so2068941wmh.4 for <42777@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:22:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QV2FlJz3je2ZLDZthdR7UnmdmhPVl6XmCanjObxiOEc=; b=jOC20ZSg4DxX0W9hhvo+wlqBcI+u1UE12kVEfHa8AJgNh6moibcEBAbDby1ZpcUIJN 1RY6oyFlOfgMEifly9wgodftD4ewRuPMLnpe3ywL4bdwpXs3kZicP8MrdQyB8hfCpyPH eGBfdulv0Dx6Mup3QL4w8IuzUZdr0R8no2tMQ2U6l8VSCzy9Ksn80uf75Qicb+kbkrL5 zTV6jEX+T87ATNsb1dhH84eyeKOPh2wN44DttWBZukyUrY4AjNRgwXibOGYmeYy1VaOT tzNAyaTVsg5VUl++fXnBkSfv9FncCqk3H1dvucda3IR6MbXUe0rTpZM9qYK0bqOJD6Pf irZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QV2FlJz3je2ZLDZthdR7UnmdmhPVl6XmCanjObxiOEc=; b=PCP8JdnoFO5+DcQXHT4/sXRrPbDN/6uwPUrKDPQNMeafVALJx7I3bMZE/bzCsTI/IJ IECmpXwWY2pqpNRslHGiz/rZ4V+vB8yuraeHdEDIFYaBwgoDPmFwo3TQgU11MhrItN4S 2CrHtLB4HdB28YdpXhKM/lAjeuwvmIzdTw41ws1UsrQ7IjATaDY72P6ecqvF06yvfzh9 ZhFCuADlqI5FXT1BlBqy4kJMTqUKF9gtIITcAfZ/eW4+6hXuX5nNyxx7Fz/N7b1MDT4W AiVABbVydS7+DNget5IdHjlP1IzGYUIwA8qgForI2sRTeZXONEX14pY5Z8j4o8145Ie+ cPwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533cfFiy2N33/BmvPt7GOsOs1Cryc/8MHWG5bWqYJqJoFdmOmQi+ STVNRlJp4So72tTmM2hP7roFp/F3+aRyLw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJweMcFV+I70XbKLPoll/dj+ySF7gvMmyelcXrKCyk22S0RL9M96yHhjb6h/3MHp6bhmAAe6nA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9dd5:: with SMTP id g204mr2899052wme.162.1598984543327; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from krug (77.68.108.93.rev.vodafone.pt. [93.108.68.77]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm2652339wmb.35.2020.09.01.11.22.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Sep 2020 11:22:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87wo1dd1p3.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 01 Sep 2020 16:14:00 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:186880 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora writes: > >> That's true. But look, the real underlying problem we have in our code >> that there is code in CEDET's idle.el that needlessly duplicates and >> uses implementation detail of the ElDoc infrastructure. The real fix to >> this bug is _integration_, and integration is hard and takes time.=20 > Indeed. And meanwhile the warning should stay. We agree then. >> In parallel, in my opinion, there is little point in having 0 warnings >> globally. Maybe that is the policy in the Emacs repo, but in my opinion >> I'd rather investigate "positive deltas" in warning count. > > No, that's not the policy, as far as I know: Warnings stay in until the > problem is fixed, one way or another. That's my view as well. So what's missing perhaps is that we close this bug and open another bug, as was Stefan Kangas' suggestion, to track the integration work. WDYT? Or maybe we should just leave this bug as that record, since it's where all the investigation done so far is registered anyway. Jo=C3=A3p