From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43887: 28.0.50; in HELLO: Javanese (Jawa) System.out.println("Sugeng siang!"); Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 23:10:18 +0300 Organization: LINKOV.NET Message-ID: <87zh4e2f9x.fsf@mail.linkov.net> References: <20201011124923.GE2923@protected.rcdrun.com> <878sc3b7jv.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878sc2zgy9.fsf@gmx.de> <83mu0ip8q2.fsf@gnu.org> <871rhuxnzg.fsf@gmx.de> <878sc2kmsq.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <87r1ptb5mm.fsf@gmx.de> <87ft67nxr6.fsf@fliptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87v9f2pv5e.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23892"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, Tomas Nordin , Michael Albinus , stefankangas@gmail.com, 43887@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jean Louis Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 22 22:12:16 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kVgwZ-000682-WF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 22:12:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53702 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVgwZ-0006XZ-1y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:12:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVgwM-0006XF-8g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kVgwL-0008HM-VV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVgwL-00005y-Rd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:12:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Juri Linkov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:12:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43887 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43887-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43887.160339747032755 (code B ref 43887); Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:12:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43887) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Oct 2020 20:11:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53999 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVgvW-0008WE-6R for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:11:10 -0400 Original-Received: from relay5-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.197]:48573) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kVgvS-0008Ve-It for 43887@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 16:11:08 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 91.129.102.160 Original-Received: from mail.gandi.net (m91-129-102-160.cust.tele2.ee [91.129.102.160]) (Authenticated sender: juri@linkov.net) by relay5-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94D121C0003; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 20:10:57 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: (Jean Louis's message of "Thu, 22 Oct 2020 11:48:27 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:191312 Archived-At: >> > I never understood that line as a joke targeting a group of people, more >> > like targeting the naming of a programming language. >> >> Would you agree that since we use Javanese script now, we >> should target the programming language JavaScript instead of Java? > > But is Javanese going to be shown? Yes, Javanese is still shown, so I changed Java to JavaScript, because this is much better: we are making a pun from the phrase "Javanese script", not targeting people of the Java island.