From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#59320: Acknowledgement (29.0.50; (Windows) Cursor is invisble unless inhibit-double-buffer is t, and then it only appears as a single pixel line) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 21:54:32 +0800 Message-ID: <87zgch22uf.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <83pmdf15z9.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilj633i4.fsf@yahoo.com> <83bkoxzsyl.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Po Lu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19263"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: kcbanner@gmail.com, 59320@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 23 14:55:40 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oxqDz-0004qZ-R7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 14:55:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxqDQ-0003Pu-DY; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:55:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxqDP-0003PR-1Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:55:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oxqDO-0006Il-Me for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:55:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxqDO-00067v-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:55:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Po Lu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 59320 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 59320-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B59320.166921169523530 (code B ref 59320); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 59320) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2022 13:54:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxqDG-00067S-QQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:54:55 -0500 Original-Received: from sonic312-23.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([66.163.191.204]:46271) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oxqDF-00067G-Na for 59320@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:54:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1669211687; bh=g+Q7mFF7JLlC9+pwY+tnEeHRMUqkrlOuTY1wGr3JvBU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=sCxfuFAPGpo/R3CCHHbbt8w/+LkyO80IBaW0B6NlyoruMGy1DR9h9yyHym1yj9E2j3eX5PZbCOEmDsSm7nPRu7HP+EQVvvz+jfgRgE3N2C87Zk+RNSto7vMcuxfnU+cq/AxSFDGjNwrcszLANYSBAY0Z25wETkVOsfTvkzqQAjsficDpZsyl/iXYTkpqxKWOrYGTrz8feKe7WYdRvMj0wHVZJDlnYL0bV3wA/dThLy95Ei8R9i4Odeuk0Vgls5oeF9yG4CMrroZL+hfWSO/Lq4/2iY6HipBnA03Tua9FGVGbEnTRpgUqHOl1J6VQxrjnxjGvCqA7j2riJ9QR0Gyakg== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1669211687; bh=VnyDUDe83GhZGmAqwTthb9un1AWwpb/zODz/s0k0hfi=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=Fyoi3K1ve3kR6u9qtFD95k1DOzWCWQwoWJcIXzd5KVovJv6OaZmC+WNwBTupDz+NHTqyPyT9oEjtU3AMksdMF3YuKLu1cMbelqUFeFKd6X6OwqKU2On+ViG1RayauZIt0FxBJcFc9Wc5Zul2ixXSpHoXKg3qy7yAXPiZFYLXi7ynXc7kgIbu7R2aMkcYTc0tK1UFh8LLcO9Bhs5cGSJ38lpXrW9zc6QkDdfcoz0yPrTdpvT1Zm/PjkhUVixSYuIC9ueBrnXqus7d/CE3iNUP67qduGYUKy0mMW+mwOS5sJwiK8IXwrnFyyxXUZYIQ5CADtKwFeyuTRV+wzZd6gglCg== X-YMail-OSG: PyduHfwVM1kysZH73HmMvp97xFfonbQiLErpVm4ESFh.XfrkpawcOqO5DxRtp_V tudifmuXLR_wHkzoJWd7ZyNQcmHdjUx0SJjXLMc1BI5MHTCppWV3X.pkEBf8A.u_1eZPTGdeiVkU 3E02r91ku9Y_AO3.eI6aqlAUABG1c_tpDNwXNDdJ5FH6MdWEyZCH4XU4Ac.dcQOJfEhvOPmoqQV7 7UsHeYPT3g.zF08COvNYmgUFJ2IRNDJtiaDkILo0DhdYKGwGoBLlQCsmQ.JL3Zdzz0MJWDfgdlu6 i_8y9Y_hkTPBucudlSHSwxXphAq_2MSPE_KCie2g6J7F0qVfc9obrUUXPgIqOez.LZjcoPFfLU8c GvdSuUfOIRb4Xrm8KkSS4hiF3JSo0gwsGirLl9UZlERgnxspN7W.hJw6uHSOIUBwzP.vL3NASpkM 5CvdIrql1d7rS4eUZoPDHTljt1ntnY45Yg34iANQAUG58BbBzeBYiGRBFw6gYAXEZHE2CAS1bL93 LnzZvZ.Ia0rR5g5jG3RNaqSMA33hjYHJHccTZy6hhHysTNkvhethefMDPOgkKHH6gt3A3x.Qz3sq EXucoac419ADHy_L_DG.Ke3FpjawDHI14ONXc8orFTWbCBOohKOqoQObCGEHTDLfd.JwTVSovQHX KU5WMJcOy2hzD2unnFAtNGTlB7BpPanw8GzuOOYmJma2K8EpIV_LaSsVIXq6FPYL3vde0Q8Z7rtm 7drff79JlW082HK2uo0gSvd990UBeDQsPg3AxqX09mguXjb_ld6auoRNJhXBCSR4Y7ydEW0xoEDj cUUqwF2i_S09D9zvcLhGzdL.8b.JShDwnQzr5WWWaA X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic312.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:54:47 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--production-sg3-6c8895b545-mvhb5 (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID c42b3d9a91859cb827c4f5b0295dec12; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 13:54:41 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83bkoxzsyl.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:44:02 +0200") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.20863 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:248744 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Po Lu >> Cc: Casey Banner , 59320@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:42:43 +0800 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > So I guess we should disable double-buffering on Windows when system caret >> > is in use? >> >> I'd only do that if all else fails. How does MS-Windows display the >> system caret, and why can't it be made to work with double-buffering? > > I don't know the answer to the second part, but if you search the C sources > for w32_use_visible_system_caret, you will probably see the answer right > away (there aren't many hits). Sure, I will give this a look in a bit (I don't have easy access to Windows right now.)