Manuel Giraud <manuel@ledu-giraud.fr> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> Hmm... okay, but I wonder why not call image-dired-track-original-file
>> and image-dired--update-header-line directly from each of these new
>> commands, after scroll-up/down, instead of implementing this as a
>> macro (which calls another macro).  That would have been much simpler
>> and easier to follow.  Or is there something I'm missing here?
>
> Yes it would be much simpler.  I was trying to "stay in line" with the
> current code.  I could try to add the scroll-up/down feature and maybe,
> in a later patch, try to remove thoses macros.  WDYT?

Here.  The code is more obvious this way and I think we should do the
same for other movements.
-- 
Manuel Giraud