From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#65344: 28.2; Unable to Edebug cl-flet form which uses argument destructuring Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 07:58:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87zg2oyjre.fsf@web.de> References: <040fe8aa-7a15-762c-e710-eb85f997d329@gmail.com> <871qg1tghr.fsf@web.de> <012813c5-cfc3-7ba9-5e84-70d79c172e77@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="30866"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: brandon.irizarry@gmail.com, Eli Zaretskii , 65344@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 18 07:59:08 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qWsVn-0007tc-W3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 07:59:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qWsVj-0002RJ-JM; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:59:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qWsVi-0002RA-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qWsVh-0001IA-M4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qWsVh-00081k-SK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:59:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 05:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65344 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 65344-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65344.169233830630801 (code B ref 65344); Fri, 18 Aug 2023 05:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 65344) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Aug 2023 05:58:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45925 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qWsV8-00080i-Jd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:58:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:51529) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qWsV3-00080S-LA for 65344@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 01:58:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1692338294; x=1692943094; i=michael_heerdegen@web.de; bh=kXubZnEan+ZQw1Ctfu8aAMt91U9UxvP+gTOagpYyE6s=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=gGF3be2m9ANni41Svo8tjpkoDVuMCwdsUUF4hhS2kdk6O5h25oUhbUJ5VK1nCXhWBSt9vZ0 GIrtnpWrCWB22rMyT3RwZKVo2C1Qh0gFqF8nL0CLzkNiE4hELG6KiyMezkGFECKDiC4/GSELQ WGhNboLHLviGyF6fADGL35Wsk/sgYu5ffkfgDd6Xt/AVUon1ui75HLFZvU0VSCDZJ5hIBzh5B fEwyUUGYtKVbC0C/2aUGRSyrUMXlHjdq1tnhmKpLZdcAsoRTFGyciWYXaA6bSDQ9Otd71pgi1 uT9T2XuoT0tpsKXBuu6gwvEMKRZpG0WGYAfhJ1Gch/ZkRSLHZGPg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.75.138.214]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb005 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MgAJ8-1ppaG02iCM-00hpMO; Fri, 18 Aug 2023 07:58:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <012813c5-cfc3-7ba9-5e84-70d79c172e77@gmail.com> ("Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?="'s message of "Fri, 18 Aug 2023 07:19:29 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:HZF9d22fMA8OLBfXe/7hEe2DMJe963gN80q3Wzn2SRTC42tH3id vC7SigVwJHN1IW2gIfbME6BAbmPKO9EuaYMjVlylSvvq1tBAxMs6bXPtd5XCZva2V61ZmLb aBCg/sX9ch14NR0qfU7XAwt7x8rb4v6gCsvD8dhWnIi8YrrFnRJ1bze3/jmin3oe0cqYIkO jq3Gr86KoO5WY2cKrMirA== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:EOJr2zp0XPM=;Kvzb5SnhX+HMZD4Ln8qzIgxdjb/ Rsn3SKN20ewHHk3fZF+Vd9zdrKM2Lh46tQRbbbG2A0RKMDuvZ3aMwtAbkfctdmxlIFYvbGRRn I5e+sgXi+KyREIUtPW5YrQR6YbVfoaAtoSTb/sybWZksjungXjYRtoiBYzxDJECuqSyunfDgc iKJnPiFftW4OVYswmMkiUX38WEWhBIql5YXgrMRfpRfitLPlBSmhjG35trBx7Z5xtnK6mpu4O xntYItw4QnAc02evra4UGEbBkTsKluJmTzrBLNtERxHsJ8nlQgHq9k0sgABmNw3GvFBR/ubgV D5+Lz62I7CL9Wbz+G2ZS1SJG+cBqSWOJlyVXey4t4ipHhZTUE3yN9aIKuA+rQsfEYGz3+4km5 /JculHfanKgzRnVFasgyzsgp659ZyAEjo/kbGzwdZ02v47wum7JL0cS1AeLzwRE2HAzEvUYjN 0cxwYwKRjlPyMYJzYeaTCp4NQbWL9hKbPVniR8xUrnFqL9A5o2y4YHiEA5kUMVUuJ56LMw2zp 5w3bQRYxfuPoTf2/29LaGLy3jRvYgBrjWuZARoWv2KIe4rsEjR92CzQ6fRgcPuVexMt31vjjX cXBtC/d5W/0YS01YrJ7tCoWN/QU0MXKwk9YpNVzBEMcig2yCIRSHKx/uY26wU07BkpTNcM7to qSNZwWpR4esWvJTBC8FsczIyzBCjqght1Z+MAbXM5kE7j+6CR2wa6OLStTjnuo3k7EVuywN/z 3YA97CGz+sDAG3//KruXBNCF2O8vChVra2rKp0Ne5exK12d6lb4BsX8hpaeNBs3If4EZpbLK X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:267719 Archived-At: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann writes: > which I would naively expect to be suitable for a single function in > an flet/labels. (Maybe without the (setf ...) case, I'm not sure > ATM). That's correct, but only one part. > Do you perhaps have an insight why there are two &name in the flet > spec? Eh - not really. That's some internal magic - to correctly associate the code with the function names or something like that, I guess. > Also naively asked, what does the &or in the flet case mean? Does it > say that that the elements of the flet can either be symbols or > functions? There is a second syntax to support: a function binding can also have the syntax (fname EXPR) instead of (fname args body...). EXPR can be a lambda expression but also any arbitrary Lisp returning a function value. Michael.