From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 13:31:05 +0000 Message-ID: <87zg26hvfq.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <97224c4f-fad4-ae01-46c1-5755d97d9a92@gutov.dev> <87fs3ztq38.fsf@localhost> <87cyz3qwba.fsf@posteo.net> <8734zztmiz.fsf@localhost> <87sf7zqs3l.fsf@yahoo.com> <87il8vs6e7.fsf@localhost> <87jztbqrc9.fsf@yahoo.com> <877cpbs5a0.fsf@localhost> <87fs3zqqgj.fsf@yahoo.com> <874jkfs4o0.fsf@localhost> <87y1hroz47.fsf@posteo.net> <83cyz2ctp0.fsf@gnu.org> <87msy6rzeg.fsf@localhost> <83wmxab0ym.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8cuqg8d.fsf@localhost> <83ttseava1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29778"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dmitry@gutov.dev, jschmidt4gnu@vodafonemail.de, philipk@posteo.net, luangruo@yahoo.com, stefankangas@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 15:31:21 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4F5-0007WQ-HD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 15:31:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4Eq-0003xV-JY; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:31:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4EV-0003ks-Rz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:30:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc4EQ-00075i-Nk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:30:42 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6D8024002A for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 15:30:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693575036; bh=KTNd9/C1dpH3e4PNY6dmnfQd+BkzxeGw6Cdqkq3F5Rg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=G8k268GC9RPE/4jQMCD9gLuF8ETbaNOowNJVsAe0ldsq65TZgF7dECoFWW6iaIAon E+finIE3jA8bYgqvyMY6Qts95+x3EjNlVp8yRmKAy9ZfsphB3JyilRI6whPmD+lO0J jq9cb6bxPWLbpQCdEkj3P7/DVMDkSnlM4lsez9JhFtQlmhETN/qKzCR8ybkRxwQLhM jKUgJbpC0mdJuCrLpiH8VVgSg8Ja9GtMJrYMEOVHT4gt7pdpXdcj/fvZtZL4QKeG4Y FgzJj6AbMzPn3wMTShQMZ6+47O2PyFq7B4cGTakb24F0KTOWW7QkccbkQbYYzFOC0u x0zUlO93Trd7A== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Rcf6Y04p8z9rxN; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 15:30:28 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83ttseava1.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309783 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> Confirm. I use Github mostly via email, exactly how you described. >> >> The annoying thing is inability to open new issues via email, though >> >> "forge" package allows to do it from Emacs. >> > >> > Is that all that annoys you about GitHub's email? What about the fact >> > that you get a lot of useless notifications that cannot be selectively >> > turned off? >> >> I can turn them off selectively in my MUA. >> IMHO, this is not any different from how I approach mailing lists - most >> of the discussions on ML are not interesting to me and I simply filter >> them out. I think Gnus scoring is relevant (although I use different >> approach). > > How is this consistent with complaints about the difficulties of using > a MUA in sophisticated ways? This branch started from your claim that in order to use GitHub one needs to check each repo manually: > What I'm trying to say here is: Email might look like it's easy to use, > but in the context of a mailing list it's not necessarily so, even from > the technical side. These text entry boxes on Github et al. definitely > feel easier and more inviting to use. Yes, but the cost is that you need to proactively to visit each and every GitHub repository to see whether something new was posted in the But it is not, and email workflow (if one wants to use that kind of workflow) is still viable. Yet, I sometimes do use those "text entry boxes" because they really feel easier in some cases. >> I do not find much difference when reading Github discussion from >> browser vs. from email. They are equally flat in both cases, sometimes >> creating confusion. > > Really? Just look at this discussion: each message clearly shows to > what it responds by quoting that text. Check out https://github.com/radian-software/straight.el/issues/1107, for example. Do you find it confusing? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at