From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69237: 30.0.50; Toggle password visibility Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 15:38:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87zfvotxqb.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87zfw0ttyp.fsf@gmx.de> <87h6i0xhbb.fsf@gmail.com> <8734tjrxt6.fsf@gmx.de> <87v86f86g8.fsf@gmail.com> <87frxgvrh4.fsf@gmx.de> <87o7c4yfzj.fsf@gmail.com> <877cisvl8s.fsf@gmx.de> <8734tgk6ql.fsf@gmail.com> <86v86cws8m.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Michael Albinus Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14304"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 69237@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin?= Le Gouguec To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 25 15:44:54 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1reFkK-0003U5-KZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 15:44:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reFk7-0007lx-7C; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:44:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reFk5-0007lW-SV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:44:37 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1reFk5-0000j6-KS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:44:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reFkU-0003WM-Bl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:45:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69237 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69237-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69237.170887227913450 (code B ref 69237); Sun, 25 Feb 2024 14:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69237) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2024 14:44:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49466 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reFk7-0003Us-8z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:44:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.19]:35767) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1reFk4-0003UR-JS for 69237@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 09:44:38 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.de; s=s31663417; t=1708872246; x=1709477046; i=michael.albinus@gmx.de; bh=3DiD5T8MjqXghawi70pws0ZN08Hbro8B0Kntojbl8QY=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Date; b=BROAFJ46Lt/LjnqN8K2MUCnbpxeuhYSuML5tTcqjt2ydrZg0ufKswYAzWA3/hIYF qZM+TJQOJjh/YWb/WGJ9xpO2M4Lz5a5W1oph7ebJZIP0RbcBcyoFtOG9666A/BjAy PMI38kSky5P/b+3MVZ6Ou8EQH0Tn8i0Gb48wzKG2nFxcuZvp/FFWqvbtluFIAZ0vR wIEihL+lA8oHlcw0e9FTzvx5m9JwdSWH6A0LH9hStt16ylsFUGLet7qfhYKRi8fu1 Q50cgXzxDP7QPg+yZfnvGX1OYekAgaCQlsZpSKsfRSdVikqwny3TRdPoJkLDSyMv+ wf0vpUN0Sv2tTBLaBg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 724b4f7f-cbec-4199-ad4e-598c01a50d3a Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([185.89.39.16]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MrQIv-1r9tEY0M1X-00oYlL; Sun, 25 Feb 2024 15:38:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86v86cws8m.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 25 Feb 2024 16:09:13 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:3q30cwqHV7s73eZEf06S6LIlJO6EFGfFF2mgoHBgGz2YruNxx4Q YcrilxZ13a1g+ZoyDcUHAoot1EFFT6GzgdzGJfqPcUB+SsgnqEKmfl6neAD9FA3HT+hA2rn sAC0xuRIM4jOr4PvqTTxCiIPLVOxXdkmrosnuTBIOPHs5jE1ndEnjZpw3CnKccivOTomei7 Xl2o+h1Q1Xg4yUl7EmwQQ== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:20PpDjBwHNA=;LCI0T68u3hNc7yMz5s6lV5KI4Fe 8emrn5k8BfV53vkqdds2WSlk9/6mHe1fTG3/pj8yafjTeTg5I64ZP0k4TEGyTpK29hT1RJzBO 7Ro5Ix7IC240zHIBP7++ipqnz9pi5qDKygkaiZJihzpDNjrOrrsn89ZFejYYc1odIL+0MetRE Iey58XWyiDemPIo083iL9tW9p/I5I00wGQUewBvN1NL2khuumJU2DomCTZPAFWEb4hqxB78KQ S/g49Ryz5/5nAn5nTCiFyTE2JlwikwE0x4EgracBeZAnKLp/kxR95cMK7EG4pz5TVZhDb0eOE 7gsgb500x1gIwRIi7nQq+lZR8Ye+WeQ+59bL0WBWd0olR13LFhz16IVeYjrrsExub0GqpOVQe uqaZVZoS9U8ui0cJTcK863DMJvyaHUPG0pEOYXX2VRV64Drvw8Ay28Hnm+Egd/3vdCnleXDfq gjBqZICdwvUmRyzvRoiDJwTNueOE7ulwigCNvs9mKsf6LQ3JEYKcMpPiGE1NMN5x4j5/vz7nF cXXaisOyDdmZ2buLGM/oUVG8geRZcfdW8IMAhuFF+A4/zJPm71Ko0Cylnru5uLq6TSxOViqTZ IBwAirWjNnaHd/GGTckC0k6jgUb8w/y9JV/cQeJyJlc9kJcfG3ObCH8EP/kZ2Y3V2A4Cmx5W5 wg2fI4xQH1+msxjiT/JSWohBxCm8BmDIUvCp5F8qdiVIu05TKIdtuSEekKXLW1DBFH8IcH5Wy 60MBW3O45psv/kNe+QqHsd/rutJCfWwuHhm3VGiTyjAskjqkSKgOSqRrhmBn+n/CiBgS08IJ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:280615 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: Hi, >> > It is not intended that users call 'M-x read-passwd--toggle-visibility= '. >> > It makes sense only when you are already editing the minibuffer, typing >> > the password. >>=20 >> Right, I don't expect many users to run this command via M-x. My >> thinking went more toward users who might want to do=E2=80=A6 >>=20 >> (keymap-unset read-passwd-map "\t" 'remove) >> (keymap-set read-passwd-map "C-c \t" 'read-passwd--toggle-visibility) >>=20 >> =E2=80=A6 and who might feel uneasy about that "--" in their personal co= nfig. > > IMO, commands should never have two dashes in their names, because > commands are never "internal", by their very definition. Changed. Best regards, Michael.