From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tomas Hlavaty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#69987: 28.2; *mailcap shell* not in buffer list Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 23:25:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87zfunp8r5.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> References: <87o7b3mojt.fsf@neko.mail-host-address-is-not-set> <86v85bjui9.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38254"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 69987@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 24 23:26:38 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1roWIY-0009oT-EH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 23:26:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1roWII-0002or-7L; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:26:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1roWIF-0002od-TG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1roWIF-0005rO-Lj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:26:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1roWIv-0008Tw-L7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:27:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tomas Hlavaty Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 22:27:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 69987 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 69987-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B69987.171131919832574 (code B ref 69987); Sun, 24 Mar 2024 22:27:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 69987) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2024 22:26:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47545 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1roWIY-0008TJ-Df for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:26:38 -0400 Original-Received: from logand.com ([37.48.87.44]:52888) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1roWIW-0008TB-9L for 69987@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 18:26:36 -0400 Original-Received: by logand.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0357F19E869; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 23:25:52 +0100 (CET) X-Mailer: emacs 28.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) In-Reply-To: <86v85bjui9.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:282037 Archived-At: Hi Eli, thanks for the quick reply. > Can you show a recipe, preferably starting from "emacs -Q"? Or at > least explain how you get to this *mailcap shell* buffer? $ emacs -Q --eval='(eww "https://dq4n3btxmr8c9.cloudfront.net/files/oj7hht/Liberties_Rule_Of_Law_Report_2024_FULL.pdf")' then C-x 1 to hide the *mailcal shell* buffer then C-x C-b to show *Buffer List* > A stab in the dark: if the buffer's name is actually " *mailcap shell*", > i.e. it begins with a space, you are right, fascinating > then you can switch to it by typing its name at the "C-x b" prompt. this works, thank you! although not very discoverable Where could I learn more about such buffer name conventions? Regards, Tomas