From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Submitting Dslide to Non-GNU ELPA Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:28:55 +0000 Message-ID: <87zfrf4uaw.fsf@posteo.net> References: <874j9o599o.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3965"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Emacs developers To: Psionic K Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 20 15:29:52 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sKHrK-0000n6-CQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:29:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKHqa-0002Tn-Ga; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKHqY-0002TC-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKHqW-00033D-AM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 09:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE46240103 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:28:56 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1718890137; bh=JQ7o95mL5qNfKvjTIE2t0/lNT//EuzKv0MGWSXgD/C0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:OpenPGP:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type:From; b=SN8AAyq9hhZhcQJsONB1Dq1oaFIjIZoI5HS5bAZNYsNIiypI7Hyr9W7p3f3JkhWyv CTLtxCQf05xHcwhVkJGs9xsmR1q5xYVfxNSDZyWu+q/InxWE0VmbeYUGCJrjSV65Oj S4wV22avNA9cNwvt8Qv5UteS/cR1tzMbxCok+VjKQcrKsC5Js5NwxMrHTF8e2ZzPP2 Pzb7fbXGWwmL2EYR60c9Mziv0T020caywtggFbV2enxqcA5t/pcoZNaksAQAjGfEWT 5URmeZUFmO1BbyVbMsKJNO5uRIwjj5Zkl7zpOyxSoTXN+vUkuACIT+2k21BBZsvZRt /Px1CW7nSkLug== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4W4hCX3ThHz9rxL; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 15:28:56 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Psionic K.'s message of "Thu, 20 Jun 2024 17:57:38 +0900") OpenPGP: id=7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66; url="https://keys.openpgp.org/vks/v1/by-fingerprint/7126E1DE2F0CE35C770BED01F2C3CC513DB89F66"; preference=signencrypt Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320320 Archived-At: Psionic K writes: >> Has development stopped on org-tree-slide? Or is this a proper fork? > > Fork, but almost a ground-up rewrite. Only the slide header > generation and related customize options are recognizable. > > Before I decided on a complete rewrite, I submitted some changes to > org-tree-slide. They are not in master: > https://github.com/takaxp/org-tree-slide/commits/develop So you are pretty sure there is no chance your changes could get upstreamed? >> Here are a few comment > > On first pass, I find most changes agreeable and intend to clean out > behaviors that lead to my versions. Did you use a tool to scan for > these changes? I didn't use any static analysis tools (beyond my own eyes), if you mean that? -- Philip Kaludercic on peregrine