From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#71934: 31.0.50; edebug--called-interactively-skip vs. new fun objects Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 07:06:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87zfqwh1gb.fsf@web.de> References: <877ce17ncn.fsf@web.de> <87sewo5vym.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Michael Heerdegen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19688"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: 71934-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Alan Mackenzie To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 05 07:07:18 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sPbAE-0004sX-9X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 07:07:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sPb9w-0002uY-Ty; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 01:07:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sPb9v-0002u7-6L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 01:06:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sPb9u-00057s-U4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 01:06:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sPb9x-0004d8-NJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 01:07:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2024 05:07:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71934 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 71934-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D71934.172015597517704 (code D ref 71934); Fri, 05 Jul 2024 05:07:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 71934-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2024 05:06:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43386 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sPb9D-0004bS-JK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 01:06:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:43111) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sPb9B-0004bD-Ko for 71934-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 01:06:14 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=web.de; s=s29768273; t=1720155954; x=1720760754; i=michael_heerdegen@web.de; bh=9hUeRLK9xWI8fGEi2qXkbDiEqEcY1CdJEt9EYeoAQTM=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date: Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:cc:content-transfer-encoding: content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject: to; b=kmasrMnw0uReJMo5GqFmRfwSTUXq/Pc0sbw/H9foiBvzBRyt1CIF72IvPvjIJO/v stEF1Q+LxZ4e7KmIAUwxPac21hz24bWNhScrSnu5XqGlkaP/SZ1Q43xARD4swfDRa AUUIkeyWxmd38KpOyWvvAXtQvUP7hynvX6B8VZlHVwI5sodl3JwRkCrIY8Qmae9H+ 0mg6z0GuqbG6EPk8odOKd32VLX7jD3KcsLu3fyWB09bNL6g9B0nxirxFpPtGORTUg gfFh38Z4xXazl1R9z15IVqsdMGeT++4A4ZxkozhJ4PHsaGRGXbuywrycMqlCd2LVr 9GeCDt1wYuG8S18jTg== X-UI-Sender-Class: 814a7b36-bfc1-4dae-8640-3722d8ec6cd6 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([84.59.210.113]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb105 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MidHZ-1rszLR1cbH-00m8Q8; Fri, 05 Jul 2024 07:05:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 05 Jul 2024 00:24:55 -0400") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ATRPH2UzO6GBMb+kmvI9zdPd78ppTbj/4R4CBfeEzZPUVSalnN9 DSKPKs6LG64hfntSX91tZzODPQBc7pPLogc8dT2MFFA1C/Y4zl74TuS8qbGl9wAeA3hB3iA IcyxYwksEjvfQgvkCAcN6zKnPuOk2fbk1dAz6tisaNOU0fvyG93rjdfnnRl89kIp2NOsni7 NP7i86dhGV0YanhoIldHw== UI-OutboundReport: notjunk:1;M01:P0:jm94+m4l304=;TSRWdE55Sg/SFMQoxAVVl9oGveK 2OYV8TDa5Q3U6IEt3cBq7KnzWVEEaZbs7eUPHZo2WXB2cISGncvcI8WKWOlEyL+xIpaENCTyD bTKqvo36QKtXewrRWGZtVmf8Yrc2BOuc/GkCvpewiMRpk9qXOE2fqQdXI/mGEs0wOq+YB/x64 hmkO8ovpwMrgridLIpBJVyNiJnt/7Btz6PjbPVdCRATPW6/dy8JPUZBCfIfpZRX/lPMLmYUUm C1BdBq/H7UqWcJkfNn1ou4ho4RVO0ctCZPhbAYyUH+NzoEk+I0iQKhuRHMZoExTidTkbNgcET WltlH8fZH7wxgWBlosivJuaxcd68TTVXspl65IizsMb1XeZemshYhaZklQChgdufQYQiikdAg HSvt6ntOCpd50kNWrnxsDT7mjX32PRnhJRnWONXOmg8lv6Oz7pUNj61w3hWpzsVO51a5wtV87 qMAGfGYiUbN+CqiaIg7zXwyi9edkLEwULnYX2Chnk6g6O/e6Qk+SOwmF52BAHTAPas7kbEjvQ DF9uUNv2MDKh9b8UE4j3BDvZHERtHVejopsQs7zn2V0nLn7Yj8J1XX11A0+o1mQmsqEs1fMEr a2DGfP7+Rt2mSk3fecXRUraPsSNZ3MEuEGoULXCVwlDaX++PCkWWUPdPXHN72TXeZzKFwfMXg EUkCJOtTsSptnFVuSuE0zr1+AEmiAV1CPHqwuCkgNgABXnzjHLwGDxZO/VdhftauMel6n6+Rr vzXPoj6AOUTjqnmDY1RyJoPCDK3zRMsg7Xt4umgf7WMXvRvRdhsqBG0xTT9Zt3KCtwchBzLF X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:288404 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I already did. What about `which-key--get-keymap-bindings-1'? For this one I CC Alan M.: > There's one case on `comp.el` which may require some update Yes, that's more or less the only other one I found: `comp--spill-lap-function'. Alan, we are discussing how relevant the code in that function is that checks for lambda and closure cars, and if it must be updated to handle the new interpreted function objects. > but I don't understand the code enough to know what it intends to > do. It seems to match both `lambda` and `closure`, hence function > *values*, but somehow it doesn't try and handle byte-code functions > which are far more common function values, so maybe the `closure` is > just irrelevant and the code is expected to match source code > expressions (whose evaluation will return functions)? Dunno. `comp-trampoline-compile' constructs a lambda form to compile. But never a "closure form". So maybe irrelevant to check for 'closure' indeed. Alan had added the 'closure' symbol in 06e4ebc81a4 "With `native-compile', compile lambdas in a defun or lambda too" which seems had been a fix for bug#64646 "Master: Native compiler doesn't always compile lambda". Guess this bug report is also an answer to Stefan's question. Michael.