From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: confusing info in C-u C-x = Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:52:23 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87y82thq84.fsf@jurta.org> References: <20051120.105550.163003414.wl@gnu.org> <87u0divrk2.fsf@jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1134173150 6299 80.91.229.2 (10 Dec 2005 00:05:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@m17n.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 01:05:48 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EksDo-0000gf-14 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 01:04:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EksEA-00058B-AH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:04:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EksBE-0004kQ-A8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:01:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EksBC-0004k4-LJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EksBC-0004k1-0E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:01:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EksCQ-0004iO-4u; Fri, 09 Dec 2005 19:02:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-33-195-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.33.195]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CF01EAA; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 02:01:20 +0200 (EET) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard M. Stallman's message of "Fri, 09 Dec 2005 16:15:11 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47356 Archived-At: > I propose using (generate-new-buffer-name "*Help*") in both functions > to generate the standard unique names like *Help*<2>. > > That would result in always creating a new buffer for this command. > That is not desirable at all. Thanks, but we won't make this change. It already always creates a new buffer *Help-2*. Do you mean that `generate-new-buffer-name' can create more buffers like *Help*<3> and *Help*<4>? In this case, "*Help-2*" should be replaced with the constant buffer name "*Help*<2>". -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/