From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Risky local variable mechanism Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:30:41 -0500 Message-ID: <87y80miia6.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87mzhbly89.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87r76fkth6.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200602080149.k181nhQ21836@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <873biufvou.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <200602080218.k182IBO22570@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139373070 9232 80.91.229.2 (8 Feb 2006 04:31:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 04:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 08 05:31:05 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6gyt-0007tK-3t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Feb 2006 05:31:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6gyr-0003Zz-Tc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:31:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F6gyb-0003YZ-TZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:30:46 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F6gya-0003Wd-Ba for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:30:45 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F6gya-0003WL-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:30:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.95.6.197] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F6h1l-0002za-DI; Tue, 07 Feb 2006 23:34:01 -0500 Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06B6B1E4244; Tue, 7 Feb 2006 23:30:41 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-Reply-To: <200602080218.k182IBO22570@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:18:11 -0600 (CST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50183 Archived-At: Luc Teirlinck writes: > Chong Yidong wrote: > > Sorry, you're just being a drama queen here. The variable in question > is a whitelist of safe variables. > > Really? You apparently do not know what your own patch does. It > makes a defcustom out of `ignored-local-variables'. This is _not_ a > whitelist of safe variables, quite to the contrary. Er, it is always safe to *add* to a list of local variables to ignore.