From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cannot understand Elisp manual node Glyphs Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 07:52:11 +0900 Message-ID: <87y7n9ins4.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170907606 10587 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2007 04:06:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 04:06:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Drew Adams , Emacs-Devel To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 08 05:06:34 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HF0Y4-000204-LW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 05:06:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HF0Y4-0008QN-6h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:06:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEveO-00033U-Vm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:52:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HEveN-00031f-9L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:52:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HEveN-00031W-33 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:52:27 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp02.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.72]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HEveK-0000Td-R7; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 17:52:25 -0500 Original-Received: from 203-216-97-073.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.97.73] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1HEve7-0004td-Ow; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 07:52:11 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 50ECD2F40; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 07:52:13 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Wed\, 07 Feb 2007 14\:29\:46 +0100") Original-Lines: 13 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:05:28 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66106 Archived-At: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > These functions are handy: > > (defun make-glyph-with-face (c face) > "Return a glyph code representing char C with face FACE." > (logior c (lsh (face-id face) 19))) Good idea, but why not just call it "make-glyph"...? -miles -- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.