From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hadron Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs and C++ codesense Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 12:18:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87y7k33759.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1177512998.732034.286160@s33g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <877irueq2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87vefaw78q.fsf@gmail.com> <87r6pwlq9h.fsf@gmail.com> <87odl0sjqc.fsf@gmail.com> <87odl0po00.fsf@pdrechsler.de> <87hcqseev3.fsf@gmail.com> <87vef8l2qe.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178361230 16505 80.91.229.12 (5 May 2007 10:33:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 10:33:50 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 05 12:33:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HkHaH-00021D-6r for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 12:33:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HkHh0-0003qt-Il for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2007 06:40:46 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newshub.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 54 Original-X-Trace: individual.net 6V5YR8g/tsujzYMN0MKVlAda8YGEfEAzcFxcS7uXtynLn+M/0P X-Orig-Path: news.individual.net!news X-Face: 2h#||Cd#d%F*NCm59[_6/{1a@jy%; |j>{D~4^gKg(^i%7j0IK?+,/GmW&:CD5fEKb_! User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.99 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:s3eFM/2+uO+0ClsQ5Fpia7wWWLs= Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:148129 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:43728 Archived-At: Maciej Katafiasz writes: > Den Fri, 04 May 2007 23:04:41 +0200 skrev Hadron: > >>>> This is all good but how did you do these things? Do you have >>>> accompanying instructions/tutorial? >>> >>> Not in any organised manner, no. It's just a demonstration of some simple >>> (more or less) functions of several packages I use, amongst them semantic >>> and related tools. The tooltip completion you can see I posted not so long >>> ago to emacs-sources, it's called semantic-hover-completion.el. Version >>> 0.1 is very buggy, though, so it's not really very usable for anyone who >>> isn't me. Unfortunately, I won't have the time to fix that in the >>> immediate feature. >> >> ok, so it wasn't a demo of what semantic can do. It was a mish mash of >> different things not likely to be reproduced by anyone but yourself :-; > > But of course, large parts of it were due to semantic usage. You asked how > it can fit C coding, this is my answer. But which bits? I have no idea which bits were semantic and which others were part of your "mish mash of other packages". > >> Why did you do your own completion? What was wrong with intellisense? >> Have you used intellisense? > > Uhh, this *is* intellisense. At least as long as you regard > "intellisense" Well, when you say your wrote your own completion package, how is one supposed to know the difference? > as a generic description and not trademarked name by MSFT. I wrote it > because the existing completion popups for semantic were not close enonugh > to the original IntelliSense, or rather, diverged in ways that seriously > hindered their usefulness. I turn the pop ups off and use tab cycle completion - works quite nicely. But again, could U request some sort of explanation of the demo gif? Just looking at it tells me nothing whatsoever about how you used semantic to do a job of work. > > Cheers, > Maciej > > > --