From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: isearch multiple buffers Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:01:22 +0900 Message-ID: <87y7dwq7x9.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <87odfcggvl.fsf@jurta.org> <87myut77c2.fsf@jurta.org> <873awlidih.fsf@offby1.atm01.sea.blarg.net> <871wc51any.fsf@jurta.org> <878x6a6ktw.fsf@jurta.org> <871wc15m2b.fsf@jurta.org> <87lk9ylkbb.fsf@jurta.org> <87hckk9uoa.fsf@jurta.org> <87abqcrq9p.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <471BE5D3.3050007@gmail.com> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193014905 27512 80.91.229.12 (22 Oct 2007 01:01:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Lennart Borgman \(gmail\)" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 22 03:01:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ijlft-00086W-Hb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 03:01:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ijlfl-0003sE-Qe for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:01:37 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ijlfh-0003mr-FH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:01:33 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ijlff-0003jy-V7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:01:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ijlff-0003jq-Qx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:01:31 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp02.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.72]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ijlfb-0006Vq-TY; Sun, 21 Oct 2007 21:01:28 -0400 Original-Received: from 203-216-97-240.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.97.240] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1IjlfY-0000M6-9y; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:01:24 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE20F2F4B; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:01:22 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun\, 21 Oct 2007 20\:51\:28 -0400") Original-Lines: 19 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:81419 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> The cryptic system "Do no lOng nameS" might perhaps still be around? > > No problem there on principle either: long names simply need to have unique > prefixes to avoid collisions, so long names per se are not a problem Are we going to stop supporting msdos 8.3 filenames already?!? I seem to recall some muttering of doing so after the 22 release, and even that was my imagination, well, we damn well should! [I can't believe, in 2007, we're still supporting such idiocy...] -Miles -- `...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.' [The Economist]