From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul R Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Maintenance suggestion on an emacs mode Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:07:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87y774uvpf.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wsn667kw.fsf@gmail.com> <87d4ojxgj2.fsf@gmail.com> <87zlrlskgd.fsf@photon.caeruleus.net> <87lk35wr0u.fsf@gmail.com> <87fxtdjg1z.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87fxtcs4rh.fsf@photon.caeruleus.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208984866 10364 80.91.229.12 (23 Apr 2008 21:07:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Stefan Monnier , Emacs Devel To: Ralf Angeli Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 23 23:08:20 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JomCD-0005Tt-En for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 23:08:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45753 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JomBX-0003Yq-OL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:07:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JomBQ-0003Vy-GA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:07:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JomBN-0003TS-DG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:07:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36943 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JomBM-0003TH-Uz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:07:13 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JomBM-0000s6-4e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 17:07:12 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id d23so4587931fga.30 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:07:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=bcUXAsb8Mgh9ezlYNLtWELXt5bCgvZ9Cd8CPx4/xm0E=; b=aXkLPouqP5AWlGa5UCAMugapEhYuWvY9LRU07eeToy79ZBASrUpZaRaEEyd1aGNa7Uup60PPwXU9wGPyEErD1FhwhAhLCkN8VZCnlj2tzoSeTC1MWys8G7l3ID4Ar5PpS0edMHYc88hhNeeaHHIQtfylYihoDEwWH6HxwoKoRp8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:cc:subject:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=Rocn+QzWOKPd5wZWNvzK+ZRf9j0DWUwsgLJuG/6C91dq1gRIAKS7pnQdVBS7syV5Cf5teYCqqRQPrxekmUVN1oWd0dcZurhmo37kxsR8a1hqsHp+xo/Zv8x+IWq3jjyqyfasGQo7RKlxyUO04eXhc3xgIiIccaNlO6oi9emw+JM= Original-Received: by 10.86.31.18 with SMTP id e18mr418068fge.68.1208984829829; Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:07:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from ubuT42 ( [82.242.132.111]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j12sm1287157fkf.6.2008.04.23.14.07.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:07:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87fxtcs4rh.fsf@photon.caeruleus.net> (Ralf Angeli's message of "Wed\, 23 Apr 2008 22\:19\:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:95865 Archived-At: Ralf Angeli writes: > * Stefan Monnier (2008-04-23) writes: > > I cannot imagine somebody changing the default. And if somebody did and > used something like the proposed `C-c C-y', the bindings would be in the > namespace of major modes. By the way, the proposal of `C-c C-y' would > also violate the key binding recommendations for minor modes. I tried reftex + emacs latex mode, and reftex + auctex latex mode. In both cases, C-c C-y was free, that's why I took it. As for key bindings recommandations for minor modes, I don't know them, may you point me to them please ? If the problem is the 3 strokes needed, how to circumvent this when there is no space left in 2 stokes keybindings space ? > > Another option would be to remove those bindings altogether and put the > code for defining the key bindings into the manual for easy copying and > pasting into the init file. Indeed. -- Paul