From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Branching Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:08:09 -0400 Message-ID: <87y6royu46.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87iqisp0ip.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1245434907 30335 80.91.229.12 (19 Jun 2009 18:08:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:08:27 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 19 20:08:24 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MHiVj-0002qi-Ry for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:08:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48367 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHiVi-0007cz-H6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:08:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHiVd-0007cp-LD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:08:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MHiVY-0007bc-Km for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:08:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41353 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MHiVY-0007bW-G1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:08:12 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po33.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.94]:57608) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MHiVY-0001it-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:08:12 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014144.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.144]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po33.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n5JI89Up009850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:08:11 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3F9DCC09B; Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:08:09 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87iqisp0ip.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:59:58 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111596 Archived-At: > Has anyone given thought to the branch tag? If we follow previous > conventions, we'd name the branch EMACS_23_BASE, but this is somewhat > misleading. I think what we want is to tag the current HEAD as EMACS_23_BASE, and create the EMACS_23_1_RC branch from that tag. Correct?