From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Commiting gdb-mi.el changes to Emacs upstream Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:33:07 -0400 Message-ID: <87y6r3dwt8.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <874otra2l0.fsf@sphinx.net.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246887719 22385 80.91.229.12 (6 Jul 2009 13:41:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 13:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Dzhus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 06 15:41:52 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MNoS4-0005ct-Lc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:41:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44299 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MNoS4-0003hs-2O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:41:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MNoRe-0003XK-If for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MNoRZ-0003UM-AE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:41:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51083 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MNoRY-0003UE-Rl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:41:17 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po33.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.94]:57596) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MNoRX-0005yw-1z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jul 2009 09:41:15 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014241.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.241]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po33.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id n66DfCCj030849 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 6 Jul 2009 09:41:13 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E32D1C10D; Sun, 5 Jul 2009 10:33:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <874otra2l0.fsf@sphinx.net.ru> (Dmitry Dzhus's message of "Sun, 05 Jul 2009 13:42:03 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112076 Archived-At: Dmitry Dzhus writes: > Should I split the big patch into several (not dozens) more or less > self-contained patches? Either this, or one big commit.