From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Sending attachments Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:27:53 +0900 Message-ID: <87y6qz8d1y.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <87k52rzyn1.fsf@benthic.rattlesnake.com> <873a9fw6dt.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87y6r7yp1y.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ljn1dcc4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4A5485D0.5060808@gnu.org> <87d48b9trl.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <871vor45w8.fsf@iki.fi> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247063473 17552 80.91.229.12 (8 Jul 2009 14:31:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 14:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jason Rumney , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Teemu Likonen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 08 16:31:05 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MOYAr-0001KD-Fp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:31:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MOYAq-00028A-TW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:31:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MOY7z-0000jQ-3t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:28:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MOY7u-0000hk-HR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44204 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MOY7u-0000hh-9W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp11.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.73]:57788) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MOY7q-0002rW-8N; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 10:27:58 -0400 Original-Received: from 218.33.236.29.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.33.236.29] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp11.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1MOY7n-000093-6y; Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:27:55 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0CC08DF32; Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:27:54 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <871vor45w8.fsf@iki.fi> (Teemu Likonen's message of "Wed, 08 Jul 2009 17:16:07 +0300") Original-Lines: 19 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:112182 Archived-At: Teemu Likonen writes: >>> always have a disposition of inline, and again not use description. >> >> Hmm, I think disposition=3Dinline is often (usually?) wrong... >> My impression is that most people, when they attach something, want it >> attached as a separate downloadable thingie. > > It's very useful to have a choice. For small textual file the "inline" > type is good because it can be seen and read without further action. Sure, I agree there are times when inline can be useful -- my objection was to the (apparent) idea of having inline be the default without prompting (I think _if_ people want to avoid prompting, inline is the wrong default). -Miles --=20 =E8=87=AA=E3=82=89=E3=82=92=E7=A9=BA=E3=81=AB=E3=81=97=E3=81=A6=E3=80=81=E5= =BF=83=E3=82=92=E9=96=8B=E3=81=8F=E6=99=82=E3=80=81=E9=81=93=E3=81=AF=E9=96= =8B=E3=81=8B=E3=82=8C=E3=82=8B