From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:02:29 -0500 Message-ID: <87y6ia67ai.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87pr3rny7e.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267545821 11678 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2010 16:03:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 16:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 02 17:03:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmUZF-0006XI-Hu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:03:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47478 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmUZE-0006GV-TO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:03:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmUYK-00061v-LB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:02:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47340 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmUYJ-00060o-G4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:02:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmUYI-0000en-J0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:02:31 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po35.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.83]:39498) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmUYI-0000ef-HC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:02:30 -0500 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014112.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po35.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o22G2TF1027855 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:02:29 -0500 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9BC84C05D; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:02:29 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 2 Mar 2010 07:42:27 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.93 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121548 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > How's feedback from Windows users working out for ya (and I don't mean > just build reports)? Gettin' any? The latest pretest has a couple of serious bugs on Windows, so IMO there is little point making the binary for it.