From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6283: doc/lispref/searching.texi reference to octal code `0377' correct? Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:30:00 -0400 Message-ID: <87y6ex2vhj.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1275501812 9109 80.91.229.12 (2 Jun 2010 18:03:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 18:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6283-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: MON KEY Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 02 20:03:28 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJsHh-0000v1-FL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:03:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48317 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJsHc-0000ea-Km for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:03:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=37835 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OJsCw-0007kY-Vj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:58:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJsCV-00018Y-NO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:34353) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJsCV-00018U-Ly for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJrmQ-0004c9-9w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:31:02 -0400 Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 6283 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 6283@debbugs.gnu.org, cyd@stupidchicken.com Original-Received: via spool by 6283-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D6283.127549980717728 (code D ref 6283); Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6283-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jun 2010 17:30:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJrlW-0004bt-St for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po44.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.78]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OJrlV-0004bG-DU for 6283-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014059.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.59]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po44.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o52HU0FJ018551 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:30:00 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 958F516D427; Wed, 2 Jun 2010 13:30:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (MON KEY's message of "Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:06:34 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 13:31:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:37488 Archived-At: The manual discussion about how *not* to match non-ascii characters is silly. Instead of discussing the bad ways to match non-ascii characters, I added a note about how to do it properly. Since the text in question is now deleted, I am closing this bug.