From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: buildbot setup Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 14:06:28 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87y6dw8hmz.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <4BEBC372.5010402@alice.it> <4BEDBF5C.1040306@alice.it> <838w7lfzdo.fsf@gnu.org> <831vddfjp9.fsf@gnu.org> <4BEE984A.4090005@gmx.at> <87eihd143p.fsf@elegiac.orebokech.com> <8739wcjosg.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87eifo9y2j.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277925178 28447 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2010 19:12:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:12:58 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 30 21:12:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU2iF-00005y-Tn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:12:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45903 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OU2hn-0000RD-ML for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:12:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44279 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OU2he-0007WV-Vo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:12:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU2cP-0002zG-NJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:06:50 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:47558) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU2cP-0002z3-Fu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 15:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OU2cK-0005G2-06 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:06:40 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:06:39 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:06:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dYFc6yRS/E8OVhiuli6hn7Qf2HA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126547 Archived-At: On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:39:23 +0200 Lennart Borgman wrote: LB> 2010/6/30 Ted Zlatanov : >> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 00:11:11 +0200 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> SM> So we could tell people to use to checkout the latest SM> successfully tested version of the code. >> >> I'm not crazy about using a branch to announce a build success.  Are LB> Can't it be just a command to checkout the successfully successfully LB> tested revision? We could use a tag. But as I mentioned there's a lot of complexity to a "success" especially if we care about more than one platform and set of libraries. >> I think it's better and less confusing to simply announce failures >> through another channel, perhaps as bugs.  Then silence will be the >> default, which is good for everyone, and builds will not have any >> effect on the repository. LB> Can't it be combined? Sorry, can you explain? I can't figure out what you mean. Ted