Re: bug#6591: 24.0.50; incorrect doc for `catch'

[Tim X <timx@nospam.dev.null>]

Štěpán Němec <stepnem@gmail.com> writes:

> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> From: Štěpán Němec <stepnem@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: 6591@debbugs.gnu.org,  rms@gnu.org
>>> Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2010 12:59:38 +0200
>>> 
>>> >> Well, just look at `when' -- ISTM it has the very same "problem" as
>>> >> discussed here. And it's probably not the only one/two.
>>> >
>>> > Sorry, I don't get your point.  Sure, there are places in the manual
>>> > that use "FORM...", but that doesn't necessarily mean it's the only
>>> > possible way of describing that.  "BODY..." is used in quite a few
>>> > places as well, and I was only talking about those.
>>> 
>>> You were asking about BODY...
>>> `when' uses BODY..., and IMO in `when' `BODY...' means the very same
>>> thing as in `catch' (i.e., "any number of forms"), which you're now
>>> apparently about to change.
>>
>> I think you are using an old version of the ELisp manual.  The latest
>> one on the trunk doesn't use BODY...  That's why I misunderstood your
>> point.
>
> (describe-function 'when)
>
>> But yes, I know that `catch' is not the only one that uses BODY... and
>> I intended to change them all.
>
> I just hope you're not going to change them to `BODY' instead of
> `BODY...', as that would mean
>
> (when (condition)
>   (a single form))
>
> `FORM...' would seem more clear, but I don't really care that much.
>
>

But I thought that was what the discussion was about i.e. 

BODY == FORM.....

but 

BODY... is equal to multiple 'bodies' which is not what is meant. 

I prefer BODY rather than BODY..., but think the CL FORM* is the clearer
when you want to indicate one or more forms.

Tim


-- 
tcross (at) rapttech dot com dot au