From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Noorul Islam K M <noorul@noorul.com>
Subject: Re: Weird notes... Conflict with lists?
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:13:24 +0530
Message-ID: <87y6bd28jn.fsf@noorul.maa.corp.collab.net>
References: <871v967y4m.fsf@mundaneum.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33965 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Osuja-0008IJ-7p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:44:59 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <noorul@noorul.com>) id 1OsujX-0006ls-Jc
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:44:56 -0400
Received: from mail-pv0-f169.google.com ([74.125.83.169]:48098)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <noorul@noorul.com>) id 1OsujX-0006i3-9G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 05:44:55 -0400
Received: by pvc30 with SMTP id 30so3348580pvc.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:44:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <871v967y4m.fsf@mundaneum.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22S=C3=A9bastien?=
	Vauban"'s message of "Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:31:53 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

S=C3=A9bastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> When diffing versions of my Org files, before committing, just noticed th=
is...
>
>  ** WAIT V=C3=A9rifier la r=C3=A9ception du BC
> -   SCHEDULED: <2010-09-03 Fri>
> +   SCHEDULED: <2010-09-08 Wed>
>     :LOGBOOK:
>     - State "WAIT"       from "TODO"       [2010-09-01 Wed 14:14] \\
>       Envoy=C3=A9 un nouveau mail.
> +     - State "DONE"       from "WAIT"       [2010-09-07 Tue 09:36]
> +       - State "TODO"       from "DONE"       [2010-09-07 Tue 09:36]
> +         - State "WAIT"       from "TODO"       [2010-09-07 Tue 09:36] \\
> +           T=C3=A9l=C3=A9phon=C3=A9. Pas de r=C3=A9ponse.
>     :END:
>
> I've experienced other weird behaviors since the new lists are in place. =
Among
> others, when creating a new node with M-RET, or such operations. Though, I
> need to get "steps to reproduce" black on white for those ones...
>
> FYI, Org-mode version is 7.01trans (release_7.01h.431.g8302).

I am not able to re-produce this. This is what I get when I simply cycle
through states.

* DONE Test header
  CLOSED: [2010-09-07 Tue 15:11]
  :LOGBOOK:
  - State "DONE"       from "TODO"       [2010-09-07 Tue 15:11]
  - State "TODO"       from "WAITING"    [2010-09-07 Tue 15:11]
  - State "WAITING"    from "TODO"       [2010-09-07 Tue 15:11] \\
    Next
  - State "TODO"       from "WAITING"    [2010-09-07 Tue 15:11]
  - State "WAITING"    from "NEXT"       [2010-09-07 Tue 15:09] \\
    Testing
  - State "NEXT"       from "WAITING"    [2010-09-07 Tue 15:09]
  - State "WAITING"    from "NEXT"       [2010-09-07 Tue 15:09] \\
    Waiting

Am I missing something? Can you reproduce this on a minimal header?

Thanks and Regards
Noorul