From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: improve rmail's MIME handling Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2010 09:05:51 +0900 Message-ID: <87y689xcm8.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <83r5e874ab.fsf@gnu.org> <83d3poaihf.fsf@gnu.org> <87eia35wqj.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291248401 7850 80.91.229.12 (2 Dec 2010 00:06:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 00:06:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, handa@m17n.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 02 01:06:36 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNwh1-0007My-VC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2010 01:06:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45552 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNwh1-0001e5-G4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:06:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35740 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PNwgr-0001Pa-PL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:06:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNwgq-0006Hm-TU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:06:25 -0500 Original-Received: from imss12.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.254.161]:52542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PNwgp-0006HA-EE; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:06:23 -0500 Original-Received: from imss12.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp (imss12.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss71 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC232AF543; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:06:22 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from mgmt1.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (unknown [130.158.97.223]) by imss12.cc.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A052AF542; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:06:22 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt1.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601A13FA0556; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:06:22 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B9E2A11F034; Thu, 2 Dec 2010 09:05:51 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" ed3b274cc037 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133290 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > I would suggest making the non-textual attachments invisible, showing > > only their header lines. > > It's better to have a single summary line. > > Could you be less terse? I don't understand what you have in mind. I explained exactly what I meant in the following two or three sentences, a line constructed as described there containing a summary of the MIME part's header lines.