From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9679: acknowledged by developer (close 9679) Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 17:18:14 +0800 Message-ID: <87y5owwiax.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87r4uwybeh.fsf@gnu.org> <87vck0lh36.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336900735 24589 80.91.229.3 (13 May 2012 09:18:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 09:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9679@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ari Roponen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 13 11:18:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1STUx2-0002bB-9b for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 11:18:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49912 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STUx1-0003pp-La for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 05:18:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STUwy-0003pk-VP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 05:18:50 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STUwx-00042O-9Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 05:18:48 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:57034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STUwx-00042K-60 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 05:18:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1STUxB-0004qP-Rk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 05:19:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 09:19:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9679 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9679-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9679.133690073918608 (code B ref 9679); Sun, 13 May 2012 09:19:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9679) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 May 2012 09:18:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51104 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1STUx8-0004q5-Nq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 05:18:59 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:32958 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1STUwn-0004pf-Jf for 9679@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 13 May 2012 05:18:56 -0400 Original-Received: from cm162.gamma80.maxonline.com.sg ([202.156.80.162]:57996 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1STUwW-0007XM-D2; Sun, 13 May 2012 05:18:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87vck0lh36.fsf@gmail.com> (Ari Roponen's message of "Sun, 13 May 2012 09:39:57 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.96 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59981 Archived-At: Ari Roponen writes: > This bug ("24.0.90; After rgrep, next-error goes to the wrong line") was > fixed in trunk, but it still happens in emacs-24 branch. > > Maybe the patch from the following revision could be backported/applied > into the emacs-24 branch. I just tested it locally, and it indeed fixed > the problem there, too. Ah, I didn't realize this was a regression against Emacs 23. I've backported the fix the emacs-24 branch; thanks for the heads-up.