From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11971: Emacs 24.1 fails to build on ia64 with "value as variable is void" Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:13:10 -0500 Message-ID: <87y5mg1rkp.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <87eho94sto.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1342660440 12333 80.91.229.3 (19 Jul 2012 01:14:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:14:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11971@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 19 03:13:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SrfJW-0001sb-Sf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2012 03:13:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41491 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SrfJV-0007wf-Uj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:13:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50727) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SrfJT-0007wa-P3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:13:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SrfJS-0006Po-EQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:13:55 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SrfJS-0006Pj-Au for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:13:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SrfPO-0007UV-79 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Rob Browning Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11971 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11971-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11971.134266076328696 (code B ref 11971); Thu, 19 Jul 2012 01:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11971) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2012 01:19:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49164 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SrfOl-0007Sn-Il for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:19:23 -0400 Original-Received: from defaultvalue.org ([70.85.129.156]:60963) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SrfOi-0007SY-I9 for 11971@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:19:21 -0400 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: rlb@defaultvalue.org) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3C0F90D35; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:15:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3326914E274; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:13:10 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:29:18 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:62134 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > There may be a problem with stack marking on ia64. Using > GC_USE_GCPROS_AS_BEFORE lets the build succeed. What does "using" mean here? Do you mean defining GC_MARK_STACK to GC_USE_GCPROS_AS_BEFORE rather than to GC_MAKE_GCPROS_NOOPS? (And Sven's probably right -- using -O1 may also avoid this failure. I had removed the special-casing we had in 23 (to set -O1 rather than -O2 on ia64), in order to see if 24 still needed it, and then forgot about the change.) Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4