From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thierry Volpiatto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13321: 24.3.0.50; Gmail error when replying from Gnus to github Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:17:46 +0100 Organization: Emacs Helm Message-ID: <87y5ecah1h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> <87zk0rffsg.fsf@gmail.com> <87mwwqg78u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip7eg43v.fsf@gmail.com> <87y5g4gp2c.fsf@gmail.com> <87txp5ocvp.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm1r4lv.fsf@gmail.com> <87fw0pihfz.fsf@gmail.com> <877gm0iyzj.fsf@gmail.com> <87621kek7h.fsf@gmail.com> <87sj4m8auj.fsf@gmail.com> <8738wksw32.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361783911 17173 80.91.229.3 (25 Feb 2013 09:18:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:18:31 +0000 (UTC) To: 13321@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 25 10:18:54 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCw-00022v-Do for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:18:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46556 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCb-0004u2-M9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCY-0004tM-KA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:27 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCW-0002VU-Tr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:26 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43462) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCW-0002VI-Pd for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uE6-0001ji-69; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87a9surugk.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Thierry Volpiatto Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13321 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.13617839926655 (code B ref -1); Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2013 09:19:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48925 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uDv-0001jH-G8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:19:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44678) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uDt-0001jA-EM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:19:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCG-0002RD-MB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:10 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:55995) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCG-0002R8-J5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCF-0004nW-Dq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCD-0002QP-Dc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40017) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCD-0002QI-6D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:18:05 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9uCU-0001dq-6X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:18:22 +0100 Original-Received: from lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net ([78.243.104.167]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:18:22 +0100 Original-Received: from thierry.volpiatto by lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:18:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lbe83-2-78-243-104-167.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:odBuDga5cY+MWxBCXuOUv+h7p/w= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:71771 Archived-At: Hi Katsumi, Katsumi Yamaoka writes: > Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >> I think that when a "reply-to" header is provided, it should take >> precedence on the "to" header actually provided, isn't it the >> purpose of the "reply-to" header ? > > That may be a sound argument, but mailing lists that use Reply-To > seem not a few. Actually, I often needed to resend my wide reply > to the author. There was no means to help it in the old Gnus. > OTOH, you have handy options. :) Ok, I trust you ;-), anyway using `message-dont-reply-to-names' fix the problem. Thanks. -- Thierry Get my Gnupg key: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 59F29997