From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich B.) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Guile-Emacs update Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:52:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87y58zav5n.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> References: <87mwpgkcsx.fsf@olor.terpri.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1374479582 23846 80.91.229.3 (22 Jul 2013 07:53:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 07:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Mailing List , BT Templeton , Emacs development discussions To: Noah Lavine Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 22 09:53:03 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V1AvW-00036j-H2 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 09:53:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59948 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1AvV-0006Q1-SC for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 03:53:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45072) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1AvJ-0006Pe-VL for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 03:52:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1AvH-0005KR-HP for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 03:52:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ea0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::233]:46861) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V1AvB-0005JI-68; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 03:52:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b15so3587373eae.38 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:52:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=7pSEgU5zIFHI0Jy4+FlXZE/p35dc8gb9f6taUGmFY/Y=; b=f+4ilkSFyngzRpmAb3cJsKyZjSXLcnLX0HogApIsLrIrGAzFWgmVb1rW1/7DCy4Jsw sxvvDBwDmn0v1ygiykhscKa9UHfxgSD8UYtSbG8b30PLlB5vJoxQbbTCf0TgoXHEaHrT w9g9Xb/otRog9+GPwTQ/ipcCbctc5UBcb1qZGuxlrRBOcIMyCHvAe1USMrprWpEP8kgb 971uo3ldbDEac8d+DHAVKX/76oTWDHriFYWs5EJcxf2XMrDRJ5aVvEoGYlCjftDd5sL5 dcNBC7IRCrYckm5MIMmfE2fnPMdzVvmktd2hTqtBfXoYwKCcjfvyACZl4zGIX8s6RmAV lSkA== X-Received: by 10.14.115.9 with SMTP id d9mr26483171eeh.87.1374479559816; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from taylan.uni.cx (p4FD9128A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.217.18.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm48693079eex.17.2013.07.22.00.52.38 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 00:52:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Noah Lavine's message of "Sat, 20 Jul 2013 21:32:36 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4013:c01::233 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10570 gmane.emacs.devel:162065 Archived-At: Great news! :) Noah Lavine writes: > I looked at the emacswiki page you linked. It links to a page called > GuileEmacsTodo, but that doesn't seem to be your current to-do list > (it was edited too long ago). The GSoC project has a better to-do list if I'm not mistaken. By the way I've had it in mind for some time that we might want to hijack the GuileEmacs page on EmacsWiki for the current (i.e. Templeton's) project, updating and merging it with GuileEmacsTodo, and moving the old contents of the GuileEmacs page to "GuileEmacsHistory". I'm saying this because it feels like the current project has achieved a very mature state, much farther than any old attempts (correct me), and might just be merged with upstream in the next few years or so. Tell me if I'm being silly. > Could you say what differences a user would notice between Guile Emacs > and regular Emacs (if any)? Are there any things that don't work, or > any performance regressions? Before this new series of changes, the two user-visible changes listed at the bottom were up to date (unless the July-upstream rebase made a difference), and the now-mentioned changes don't immediately sound relevant to them, so I wouldn't be surprised if they're still up to date. I'll definitely test the latest version later today and update the list as necessary though. (Feel free to do so before me, of course.) Taylan