From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jambunathan K Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Trunk still not open Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 23:21:21 +0530 Message-ID: <87y5071jl2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <6xwqfxhl88.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83txb1mcsy.fsf@gnu.org> <87siqlku0i.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87wqfxari2.fsf@yandex.ru> <87ha70kyy3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <5323B66B.5070405@yandex.ru> <837g7vdg70.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnx5l9is.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <878us732oj.fsf@gmail.com> <874n2v2zcb.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395165221 30418 80.91.229.3 (18 Mar 2014 17:53:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 17:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Stephen J. Turnbull" , Emacs developers , Eli Zaretskii , Dmitry Gutov To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 18 18:53:48 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WPyCx-0001bD-9B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:53:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36772 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPyCw-0002aW-VF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:53:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48907) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPyCl-0002X4-QA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:53:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPyCd-0006c0-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:53:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::233]:57381) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WPyCd-0006ax-4r; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 13:53:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id w10so7466854pde.10 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:53:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=XVTv/HCWc4GN6xMlzO/LtPJj2h/eXNKUKSI6w/ggLnQ=; b=W5r11mJgG+sVwpazp5qcHBC4JPpqJ0IQr8T2q/lwzA8h6x3ccgIPxoU8vLJg/Jd0hg WteJBhd1bFkIrOIWGPK4y2bOZWHkSTIZdbMiyJKLLMuzR4gfAxgc3rOqio4lZFbtWDZ7 yoH3FZuvVohQVopyU8oFwtuF5dkuY7WaUIjnrSG5uCzuLztGRgYfCzaMe7LmkD18CI8+ SfHjPBpZ0ecYbeSV77mQmuiFNPTSHmlLnrWX7DxMrSGm7LbWPT7NfBx/0LR8hCPE2+ac cFi/4fLWr0VOxT6CvEvN45qfqCZSeEzqNh4i2g5QFiDprCq7J1hHnItuiyvU9TEzS7ej qfFw== X-Received: by 10.68.136.133 with SMTP id qa5mr34303258pbb.63.1395165206062; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:53:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from debian-6.05 ([101.63.194.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id vo1sm90971194pab.32.2014.03.18.10.53.22 for (version=TLSv1.1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 18 Mar 2014 10:53:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 18 Mar 2014 18:30:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::233 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170491 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: You won't be able send in patches, if Maintainers take a strict view. You are arguing that Maintainers should take a lenient view because patches are exceptional. (You are trying to divert the discussion) ---------------------------------------------------------------- > I'm bothered by the fact that stupid people don't spontaneously > combust, which they should. > -- Erik Naggum Erik Naggum is already combusted or composted. I am not. In this list, the arguments generally boil to this: 1. Dog twists the tail. 2. Tail twists the dog 3. Dog becomes tail. 4. Tail becomes Dog. (3) or (4) adds complexity and nuance to discussion.