From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] sequence manipulation functions Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 13:16:04 +0800 Message-ID: <87y4re746j.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87oasmmwzt.fsf@gmail.com> <87bnolslph.fsf@gmail.com> <87zjc2dic0.fsf@gmail.com> <87ioimtzu0.fsf@gmail.com> <87lhngcnrc.fsf@gmail.com> <87k330cj3u.fsf@gmail.com> <87ioikcf39.fsf@gmail.com> <87h9y4c93e.fsf@gmail.com> <87389oggab.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <87tx23sxah.fsf@gmail.com> <6902490d-9011-401f-8ae5-99181d808e06@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415942204 2969 80.91.229.3 (14 Nov 2014 05:16:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 05:16:44 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 14 06:16:37 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp9FL-0007Im-UU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:16:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34940 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp9FL-000490-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:16:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp9FB-00048t-2X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:16:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp9F3-0002KK-Ij for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:16:25 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp9F3-0002JT-Cz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:16:17 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xp9F2-0007CJ-LV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:16:16 +0100 Original-Received: from 221.222.154.121 ([221.222.154.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:16:16 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 221.222.154.121 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 06:16:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 221.222.154.121 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoAgMAAADxkFD+AAAADFBMVEUvT09qWs3/pQD///+J kUVcAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMLOd3veKQA AACuSURBVBjTldE9CgIxEAXgB+lEyFUC2wo5ikdZ8DSypxhMY7H9VuIVwlqkGRgnm59VsHGafIQ3 CZlAtmKIRaHETgYa12lqvEsPYKf8wXHsPGfqPaUM0g9aJPKFXkmNQmSDqwzz4Fpgpz+6WAPY2z5o uPJJpu0uypcl4nyCibMLQ8lCiVjayLoQvw5LsVKQuHPRR958HZbOcVsKeepcLxpByjycGvnKmY+c MBvrtyjfe0vmuLvdq/kAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (CentOS Linux 7 (Core)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vWZ/zpdfM2Ieh5IWBptEhvFFtD0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177030 Archived-At: On 2014-11-13 13:21 +0800, Drew Adams wrote: > It should be based on the existing sequence functions in Common Lisp, > as stated earlier. Such things were worked out for Lisp eons ago. > There is really no reason to do something very different, other > things being equal. I think most people will like this option. So I was hypothesising what was being done i.e. `If we were to model another set of list/seq routines after other......' since we already have one after CL. Leo