From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18971: 25.0.50; incorrect warning from byte compiler Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:40:35 -0700 Message-ID: <87y4pqtfbg.fsf@tromey.com> References: <87egthoti4.fsf@tromey.com> <87h9ycuyan.fsf@tromey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419882083 27555 80.91.229.3 (29 Dec 2014 19:41:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18971@debbugs.gnu.org, Tom Tromey To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 29 20:41:16 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5gBm-0001yH-16 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 20:41:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5gBl-0008Bz-G5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:41:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5gBh-0008Bg-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:41:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5gBc-0005yw-J9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:41:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51184) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5gBc-0005ys-BS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5gBb-0000X1-Pz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:41:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Tom Tromey Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:41:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18971 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 18971-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18971.14198820572022 (code B ref 18971); Mon, 29 Dec 2014 19:41:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18971) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Dec 2014 19:40:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60550 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5gBU-0000WX-Ab for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:40:56 -0500 Original-Received: from gproxy9-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([69.89.20.122]:41415) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5gBM-0000WJ-Mc for 18971@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 14:40:49 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 25992 invoked by uid 0); 29 Dec 2014 19:40:45 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO CMOut01) (10.0.90.82) by gproxy9.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 29 Dec 2014 19:40:45 -0000 Original-Received: from box522.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.122]) by CMOut01 with id ZXgg1p00F2f2jeq01XgjFv; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:40:46 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=fJeqg/qe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:117 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=udL4O0NGDEAA:10 a=zstS-IiYAAAA:8 a=PnD2wP_eR3oA:10 a=-Ceb2LbMfV4A:10 a=A92cGCtB03wA:10 a=MuUFlfo4jzAd3PHgdxYA:9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=4c9yhAJRxXMCks4IZvmW8Iq11Qa9NBSIrQ8cZFS5Ics=; b=UqX4hTTauJ/DEInfgOxryvWWzlqmWpB6+SfFkF++5dqP1ekSuXvr46b4m1JDcc6kR7kxd4b07Cj1BS7QbDgltcFdu2+LKuT0xC8lVbiOFLHtLKthlrtxSFAFwcckMF0p; Original-Received: from [71.33.142.103] (port=41598 helo=pokyo) by box522.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5gBD-0003KL-Hw; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 12:40:39 -0700 X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:27:10 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Identified-User: {36111:box522.bluehost.com:elynrobi:tromey.com} {sentby:smtp auth 71.33.142.103 authed with tom+tromey.com} X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:97814 Archived-At: >> I want to be able to call byte-optimize-form and was under the >> impression that byte-compile-close-variables was needed. I'm doing this >> for a project I'm working on where it is convenient to let the byte >> compiler code macroexpand a form and do some simple optimizations on it. Stefan> Just curious: why do you need those simple optimizations performed by Stefan> byte-optimize-form? I'm writing an elisp compiler and it just seemed handy. I can probably reimplement the optimizations though. Tom