From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Defending GCC considered futile Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:30:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87y4o63mt4.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <20150207202952.1042BC00A6@snark.thyrsus.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423510439 28742 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2015 19:33:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Eric S. Raymond" , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 09 20:33:54 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YKu5h-0002t0-3q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:33:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34858 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKu5g-0002XI-GB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:33:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46847) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKu2Q-0005oE-L3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:30:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKu2P-0005Sw-E7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:30:30 -0500 Original-Received: from albireo.enyo.de ([46.237.207.196]:32914) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKu2I-0005Qi-E5; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:30:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) id 1YKu2A-0005KC-A2; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:30:14 +0100 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YKu2B-0001Nw-BH; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:30:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 08 Feb 2015 19:04:47 -0500") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 46.237.207.196 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182726 Archived-At: * Richard Stallman: > > Speking as the original author of GUD, I'm in favor of it supporting > > LLVM and everything else imaginable. > > The question at hand is not about LLVM, or GCC. It is whether to > install support for something called LLDB. What exactly is LLDB? It's the system debugger on MacOS X. =E2=80=9CWith the release of Xcode 5, the LLDB debugger becomes the foundat= ion for the debugging experience on OS X.=E2=80=9D It's difficult to understand why LLDB support is unacceptable, but MacOS X support is fine.