From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19869: 25.0.50; default-frame-alist: width versus fullheight Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:31:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87y4nz2l2u.fsf@web.de> References: <87twyo13h0.fsf@web.de> <54E08498.2050603@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1424017946 19466 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2015 16:32:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 16:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19869@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 15 17:32:15 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YN27C-0002Z8-HM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:32:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35821 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN27B-0000Zn-NF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:32:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49286) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN274-0000Ym-PQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:32:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN270-00054Q-4I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:32:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53620) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN270-00054M-1a for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:32:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YN26z-0003uV-Ra for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:32:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 16:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19869 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19869-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19869.142401787614979 (code B ref 19869); Sun, 15 Feb 2015 16:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19869) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2015 16:31:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44860 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YN26F-0003tW-QU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:31:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:51316) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YN26C-0003tG-TA for 19869@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:31:13 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.218.210.48]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MMnD5-1YVZTx2NSB-008Zz0; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 17:31:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <54E08498.2050603@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 15 Feb 2015 12:35:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:2s9DcP+4QocJTXCvj5FXHnHb0DGeYwT8esYxZ/UGhmzQpnmP0cO Ab16cVbUgHWTuxC10YZ2cUZ1Hljmh2HaDiztXs1GPN1hhgmo6YrKSsfW75Schz2CSw/pJhh GmNVhfcLYhjG/HtVCf0rnSjwVZY/LlPDQGJ7TJNlJCdBbY2y0LJBIybJWQyA19ZEGVy6hUf nA/rmXWDFg8OdwXSdqspw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:99437 Archived-At: Hello Martin, I'll do what you suggested later today, thanks. One comment to what you wrote: > They are here (Gtk+, Lucid, Motif and Windows) so probably your window > manager interferes in some way. I don't think so. I already did some edebug yesterday, and I saw that the width of the frame had already been changed when the frame was not yet displayed.