From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Calling (package-initialize) sooner during initialization Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:11:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87y4lpii89.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> References: <87383xk4ia.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429369925 13118 80.91.229.3 (18 Apr 2015 15:12:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 15:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Artur Malabarba Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 18 17:12:01 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YjUPX-0005ey-Vm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 17:12:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45923 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjUPX-0007t2-4H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:11:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjUPT-0007su-M3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:11:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjUPR-0005H7-A2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]:37553) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjUPR-0005Gk-1z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 11:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: by widdi4 with SMTP id di4so48596061wid.0 for ; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:11:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=yvPinCp0zWUFgPVIAPIUJSuPTKIyW/N+9pjmZXOZNOg=; b=1AWFUQJdMjeuXLUGdxyRR0PaLuawaaVwuIKsm4D3fe9WklM9UzkXB41xdmgfaCwl/3 kJR2iMYLiBTfH87Qu9Cj3i8vdn5tO7Y7eu/d3Q5gZ+DwTpJqZPz9HtqgSw2vVSAVqylc aG0Y7cueXOOOpdIC0deleFFPqMdVXF6bCfTLTrfgqe2Uv2yKK6gDby6pgL4rqnfoUBgA uhaa1W5f5yJGkPHi/RS1xBq5GpQxI0xzaqUAl80tOAP8+wYWjcoOCgigqgyspluLLSoF sEUqiq+qFmtzSMAdHK30rrZ0LbP+ZMYpe/3rN/k97RhV1EZA5cvC7PMbJRaSYw/BEWwo jC3w== X-Received: by 10.180.96.200 with SMTP id du8mr10467338wib.54.1429369912285; Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:11:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from taylan.uni.cx (p200300514A439B920213E8FFFEED36FB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:51:4a43:9b92:213:e8ff:feed:36fb]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id kr5sm19303182wjc.1.2015.04.18.08.11.51 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 18 Apr 2015 08:11:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Artur Malabarba's message of "Sat, 18 Apr 2015 14:32:34 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:185596 Archived-At: Artur Malabarba writes: > I suggested this on a previous thread (before starting this one) and > someone complained of yet another file affecting emacs behaviour. What's so bad about having one more file in ~/.emacs.d that affects Emacs's behavior? It's the place for such files. I don't see any problem at all. Maybe I'm missing something; can anyone think of any actual disadvantages? Taylan