From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Belanger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Contributors and maintainers Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:45:11 -0500 Message-ID: <87y4ewxoug.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87si59wj42.fsf@T420.taylan> <877fmjj9p6.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zizfm2dq.fsf@T420.taylan> <871tcr7yvq.fsf@fastmail.com> <87mvvfm0bd.fsf@T420.taylan> <56250803.5080601@cs.ucla.edu> <87a8ren5ys.fsf@T420.taylan> <56259BB1.3070908@cs.ucla.edu> <878u6ykmvt.fsf@T420.taylan> <87h9llvo98.fsf@members.fsf.org> <5626622A.3090707@yandex.ru> <87zizdijbp.fsf@T420.taylan> <56267302.7050606@yandex.ru> <87io61igyu.fsf@T420.taylan> <56267CDF.6010201@yandex.ru> <87wpuhh15s.fsf@T420.taylan> <562683B9.1060305@yandex.ru> <83y4exe71v.fsf@gnu.org> <87zizcfzna.fsf@T420.taylan> <83r3koe2nj.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445492424 8506 80.91.229.3 (22 Oct 2015 05:40:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 05:40:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 22 07:40:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zp8bo-0002ww-12 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Oct 2015 07:40:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51963 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zouex-0007iu-Lo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:46:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35315) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoueT-0007gR-3h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoueP-00044z-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:46:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]:34418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZoueP-00044t-0S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: by obbda8 with SMTP id da8so42400980obb.1 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:46:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:references:reply-to:cc:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=ZRNtiJDYOeHq8TIDVEra+SoVJbS0yVPUfoTtdu53lkI=; b=W1T3J7TwVHNUP8JIFswaEVF4/IOPzmQyVHfup14NxpYw40YDc/Jl5d9ZnMAcPjGD1j Adonv2IdF+v6LI+D6FiwfKuqbqf4lG7+BiU1PKTGlYrEaxJQiUvFzKPGdJ6GbZ5OE0/9 RSylspThNg85mlXSzzXrta5q5aE5U4rIqOYFer7Zituul5mYH5QBud0DT5PH4Y8Ani3Q ANoXBfp6q3nBvEuLWG0hEI7+8GYgQ/zso4ER7sa06c/QaPFoMZKItCv73QJX4zz6HRWa xkPFVnaGZysNKtoEdh52YKm1joEcGOSw/T32Gn2Q6szrDAZ/BVXskIjHFoLT7EJb6o+W Q9Tw== X-Received: by 10.60.69.65 with SMTP id c1mr6296621oeu.38.1445438760668; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from belanger-home (67-60-185-108.cpe.cableone.net. [67.60.185.108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p3sm3635083oei.9.2015.10.21.07.45.59 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Oct 2015 07:45:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83r3koe2nj.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:07:12 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192347 Archived-At: > There's no disrespect, there never was. Respecting an opinion does > not mean it must be accepted. Rejecting an opinion or a patch doesn't > mean disrespect, it just means disagreement, in this case on purely > technical grounds. There have been plenty of disagreements on emacs-devel, but I've never seen an Emacs maintainer or Emacs bigwig (such as Eli) show any disrespect to someone else on the list. I have seen cases where others showed disrespect to the bigwigs, but (impressively) it wasn't returned.