From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marcin Borkowski Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Thinking about changed buffers Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:17:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87y49273wp.fsf@mbork.pl> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459196304 29866 80.91.229.3 (28 Mar 2016 20:18:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 20:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 28 22:18:16 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1akdc6-0008Fx-VZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:18:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42646 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akdc6-0004AY-7Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:18:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44529) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akdc3-0004AR-FG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:18:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akdby-0006uW-Qq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:18:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([2a01:5e00:2:52::8]:54941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1akdby-0006uQ-Jm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 16:18:06 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4226A63770; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:18:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.mojserwer.eu Original-Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.mojserwer.eu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hlmkM0XI739e; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:17:58 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (98-171.echostar.pl [213.156.98.171]) by mail.mojserwer.eu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A9BB6A6376B; Mon, 28 Mar 2016 22:17:58 +0200 (CEST) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.13; emacs 25.1.50.7 In-reply-to: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 2a01:5e00:2:52::8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202359 Archived-At: On 2016-03-28, at 21:13, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Personally, I have relied on the a-then-delete behavior when I >> _want_ the file to be considered modified*. > > Same here (tho I use SPC DEL instead). And here. >> * that said, I don't necessarily have a compelling reason for wanting >> a modified buffer. > > For me, the full idiom is "SPC DEL C-x C-s" which I use to force Emacs > to save the file. [...] Same here. Best, -- Marcin Borkowski http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science Adam Mickiewicz University