From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23377: 25.0.93; Completion is extremely slow for insert-char Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 22:54:33 -0300 Message-ID: <87y47zke92.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wpnlnrlz.fsf@gmail.com> <83mvog28d2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461722125 7126 80.91.229.3 (27 Apr 2016 01:55:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23377@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 27 03:55:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1avEh7-0000wa-GJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Apr 2016 03:55:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40359 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avEh3-000237-3S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:55:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35195) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avEgz-0001zI-Sf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avEgw-0000Ie-Kt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:55:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1avEgw-0000IU-Hn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avEgw-0005Z0-8F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23377 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 23377-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23377.146172208221358 (code B ref 23377); Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23377) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Apr 2016 01:54:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49245 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avEgb-0005YQ-P5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:54:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ig0-f176.google.com ([209.85.213.176]:38768) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1avEga-0005YD-Sw for 23377@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:54:41 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ig0-f176.google.com with SMTP id m9so28705812ige.1 for <23377@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:54:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=U6M5t8L5/ouGzJZ1ZU0bycd059ZznuwORzcCrzR7yGk=; b=tEOalfZrSAp6LRmTWOnVfpvZHw+MkGECN/7ptWx1XdN27MZP/Lf7LL/axov1F+m3UT BRuBFT5AvBEk0OWo/jyv9OC81xuSO67aS10xj5hztFZCiNowc7+aplb4H6d3e/GVKW0j AuqatBMMy+69xBhnfuJagJkgFT6r7y76M72r3Kn0ef+nWfwHRkwA56frh/s9sRxn23JI 1JHiujo7etTigzMOiWVRIqkSvgZtwXPUZfWV1BdcH9V2BHUIUxTi7ORKKfn4eTiSoAjt RDchSYHsYxMPSl98pA3LMPW1IV0mLgUWYaJ+KFXjW1CMlq6xFDittu0XWL3eclodFH94 3Hzg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=U6M5t8L5/ouGzJZ1ZU0bycd059ZznuwORzcCrzR7yGk=; b=WyRbgpxxvaFEM1V0RvvJEZoHm8+pNwEuFwnZ4rUSVHF8RQbTjl9BSvRRXNrCjLFN9b vBMVJH82LNVBhFi9NgEV67rv2cpn/YXbzkj3/LSKuYmlMBZyUz0+JhUCl+F2SxHNXexU uXtJHtHxPFZFCkP/B9ZY/adwYPJbirwVc9sPYD1dcBYoIq/gsEQFmJEHIZ/n7K+c9AQ4 zguqcYytxdFiyyxctQA8G4I4Cp9D85/ZjGGuXZQwCarrRHOACQgM+OClhEDeVMf441q5 5d9Bj3jwlYodXkA4md5s5frfaN5DlTOj9QmkyCyR5/ej1QlNk/kUVWGbc6z0KY/V3e/P 0C+g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXX3EY61U9iSR0ECtcMsVU+t3PI1uQRXpT5QeWZ8iD8fmUKCiqD5ezJIqMU9GFKuA== X-Received: by 10.50.246.14 with SMTP id xs14mr23399386igc.47.1461722075348; Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:54:35 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from moondust.nodomain.none (blk-30-139-186.eastlink.ca. [96.30.139.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qd7sm3192032igb.0.2016.04.26.18.54.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 26 Apr 2016 18:54:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83mvog28d2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:26:49 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116895 Archived-At: At 09:26 +0300 on Tuesday 2016-04-26, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: nljlistbox2@gmail.com (N. Jackson) >> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 21:25:28 -0300 >> >> emacs -Q >> C-x 8 RET TAB >> >> This takes over a minute on my Emacs before the completions buffer is >> displayed listing the characters. (On subsequent invocations, it's more >> like eight seconds.) On Emacs 24 it is effectively instantaneous. > > It takes 11 sec here on the first invocation, and is instantaneous > thereafter. I just rebuilt with -O3 and no (other) configure options. (The above was with -O0 with checking turned on.) With the new binary, with the recipe above, the buffer displays in six or seven seconds. (It takes about the same amount of time on subsequent invocations.) That isn't stellar, but it's not the huge problem I reported before, when it was taking over a minute.