From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall? Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:44:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87y42gi4q8.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87lgykci0z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87h997u1rq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87oa3dkct4.fsf@gmx.de> <87k2e1joi7.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474803908 20461 195.159.176.226 (25 Sep 2016 11:45:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2016 11:45:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 25 13:45:02 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bo7rh-0004aS-V4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:45:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37847 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bo7rg-0003Ki-DQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:45:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bo7r9-0003KL-BD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:44:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bo7r5-0008Ie-7B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:44:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:49961) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bo7r4-0008IK-TS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 07:44:23 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([79.195.0.131]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1jKo-1ayu551wao-00ti6i; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 13:44:17 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 24 Sep 2016 14:40:28 -0400") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:NgQKiFZ2f+k1OOJdGDDac4lqIq+2Ucy/vU7tT1BQLrW2KdBpN13 QRHwkB9vXgpFUTTn5r0tReCa2LMfbEFqxcIefMwNb3HivisPgzpJjKlezGWYWLqtCqq4+TI 8ppwgdi3i7RGhKVBpjAtcXIBylYZSEQrQIAhupuLWcSmkvwlbUJfT3FfKDI8ai0vlLX2KI6 ltHuGVxwKVDmlfBwR1mzQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Y1aNLnFJUn8=:hCbicUAt9N07pqxQDIoeJi Oj8BmQ9MvFs1gpfuPOyGNbOendqfvVnEiV3E2xi9FxuoOQSqlkcuICEwZaweLrfeEtNWVEl4N 3QNhtS2nLh1nODauNfGWgbMCJvZnTomDVnmG6iyAKThS6RAcJspDAjJEbl5vNKvQrKDjqwVjO iXvFJBCRp4J0uq4DgXrgijOx+7O8VTEjxsC+QvoyAm78M6KenpUbw0fhKNEp/ee1vCEk9xHta KgIGpQl2jASLdwE9kMsJB1OAEMfQbL1jevsn4UpK3pBoNT0NdfhaFGIZFCp10mkFOWfADprgz fqRP+2wPM0NsE9NeKgVSozIzdpDqHoPSFOrRHtmCQT8dYY/lYqd0QJFyVvppbMxw3kGz6Z2v3 tXSQ9tumz6GjqmOUxxn54HYs0N9P41v14ioLtJ4ehvP9lmosbDD/21FtIjiofHIhCODgFG63R OACUGvhzmUxSZB/BnzU6PZ9717ZNSJnpbl4uLo5GFim6OXn64MGoI+l23+ycC47UCoW9GZwNF 2g0FwM43NKPRYwxMWIcxWTdq5PPp+7npliqHKbxCqxQhbG5ncGi17tq8yBdMwjxTGUZ3oDsPH 80xZIuVuMtCINqnUt7Hs9J0juUCuLk6oPQMj3gj2+IfpVfq1N1OaMlnMeh9YQS0Ku6hqsSSIj WyrlnPJvbfg2tz7snU1ubtHqPSvvJrNxKpHnDzSs043kRAbph8hD6u/jyc0Nb3LOMitJPqCeG 3XmC/45Igit5rArcZCjYZEunyHY9Dmh95Yzoh6tr5u8IFtHCjvrz/nG4C7o9ycHOdTlh8UvK X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.21 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207779 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> With Emacs 25, yes. But there are still warnings when compiling with >> Emacs 23, I believe. > > As I said, if you care about the warnings you get under old Emacsen, > I can't help you (I can understand supporting some older Emacsen, but > worrying about the warnings they give baffles me completely). I haven't asked for help :-) I'm just explaining why `tramp-compat-funcall' is still used. And yes, warning-free compilation even with older Emacsen is a benefit for me. > Stefan Best regards, Michael.