From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Christopher Pinon Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Rmail: 'reply' vs 'reply-all'? Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 13:05:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87y3xq2k17.fsf@secondfloor.xyz> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485959382 26785 195.159.176.226 (1 Feb 2017 14:29:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2017 14:29:42 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 15:29:34 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cYvud-0006X4-DP for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 15:29:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51264 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYvui-0006zf-Mh for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:29:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYtfZ-0000z3-I9 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 07:05:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYtfW-0002Gu-BE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 07:05:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.secondfloor.xyz ([199.180.249.237]:65276) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYtfV-0002GQ-VE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2017 07:05:46 -0500 Original-Received: by mail.secondfloor.xyz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7905160099; Wed, 1 Feb 2017 13:05:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=secondfloor.xyz; s=secondfloor; t=1485950740; bh=lz8PnEo2SFuzEIvMfjS2B9SeRhvQBkFqEfyAFbij99w=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=BWBME9hAmkrLtIE5FgW5uo3DgCL5kY0STPzUEqqyhNmP4nIauHmW0rHezpXulzEH3 6+i583hM2Rhesp3oT6oMZRv+LhoTQN2Od9QlOf2ylfSRR6HjHChoMZ8qZOyL9vKb4y LFp0/lKfABBQBqiixSACuaiiKqIFFhUbFyWi8G+8= X-Mailer: Rmail; GNU Emacs 25.1 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 199.180.249.237 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 09:28:55 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:112227 Archived-At: I'm familiar with Emacs (using version 25.1), but new to Rmail, which I've been testing. My quick question is: is there a simple key distinction between 'reply' and 'reply-all' in Rmail? In more detail, the Emacs manual, specifically, https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Rmail-Reply.html suggests (on my reading) that typing 'r' will add the 'CC' field to the header if the incoming message contains recipients in this field. In contrast, typing 'C-u r' will omit the 'CC' field entirely. Unfortunately, in my testing, typing 'r' (like 'C-u r') omits the 'CC' field when the incoming message contains recipients in this field, and I have to add this field manually if I want to have it. Am I missing something obvious? (My customizations are minimal and don't concern 'reply' in Rmail.) Any advice would be appreciated. Thank you, C.