From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27560: 26.0.50; seq-uniq is slow Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 16:09:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87y3s5pq81.fsf@petton.fr> References: <8760farkxt.fsf@petton.fr> <87inj964oq.fsf@calancha-pc> <87bmp1r5ng.fsf@petton.fr> <877ezpr5jc.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499091023 20591 195.159.176.226 (3 Jul 2017 14:10:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 14:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 27560@debbugs.gnu.org, tino.calancha@gmail.com, 27560-done@debbugs.gnu.org, ohwoeowho@gmail.com To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 03 16:10:15 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS23F-0004eh-9z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 16:10:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS23K-0008UF-Lz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 10:10:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36555) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS23D-0008TD-4h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 10:10:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS239-00005R-6Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 10:10:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47725) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS238-00004z-Vw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 10:10:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS237-0003xE-S0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 10:10:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Petton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:10:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27560.149909095015138 (code B ref 27560); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 14:10:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2017 14:09:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50402 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS22I-0003w2-FH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 10:09:10 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:55422) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS22G-0003vg-OI; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 10:09:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <877ezpr5jc.fsf@petton.fr> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1499090943; bh=BMsw8ENB4f4ESNuyisendLrAGrQ7BYTeNESn1yWB0yw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AWQ4P3IBgP9W9QQaTB1t3rzqb/SWTixfpP4N2/ZLY+1vqomr0YiHjaV1AoOJKDSO8Z1LyeKi8owsDQemFUdf1pVk3YlURofsuLcnVTB5n1bKVlzCJFwIOdxB4Dpivwf3NiechHMudrQ7i8l4ajC4FXXfRJDi1HdbLKcFRG+GHrU= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134120 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Nicolas Petton writes: >> Indeed, I will run some benchmarks as well. In your benchmarks, cl-lib >> is still much faster than seq-uniq, even if it's not as impressive as >> Oleh's benchmark. > > It looks like I read the benchmark results wrong :) seq-uniq seems to be much faster than in 2015, while its definition basically hasn't changed. I won't investigate much further as I'm happy with then benchmark results. Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZWk/+AAoJECM1h6R8IHkQoAoIAM/oIx1YogmKzggxef8WD/dQ i653CvxQrjQO3IxpQuq68dWyc5Ir6WFaPap78RUEuYb6ZCjSBmu4XkehfI42uD3v YW0dUrdcjqGERioQ87R5CYqd3s2Ty5Xim9ieYrlIPNtsITgOG2grpb6+qnlHKfqe woxjzxlIIsl+yOgsNIkslLwjRcNhjRAXUvrg9rPRK8b0w44/SVWW+FgWX9RpIoda 758ATB9rmMvmVMHNEJimma8CAv/x4Qrx3W0lpqSTFEatPMO9HvQAts3FckTzXIhM 1zQUVUTEsVN7LmG2LzAGJgNNq1U0TAHFRkus5Moq6HiM0c9LOIY3KCWjqHi5tJk= =iGtH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--