Nicolas Petton writes: >> Indeed, I will run some benchmarks as well. In your benchmarks, cl-lib >> is still much faster than seq-uniq, even if it's not as impressive as >> Oleh's benchmark. > > It looks like I read the benchmark results wrong :) seq-uniq seems to be much faster than in 2015, while its definition basically hasn't changed. I won't investigate much further as I'm happy with then benchmark results. Nico