From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Flymake refactored Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:26:30 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87y3oxa2tl.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87h8vmj3tr.fsf@lolita> <873775blkz.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1506702452 26348 195.159.176.226 (29 Sep 2017 16:27:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 16:27:32 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 29 18:27:28 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dxy8I-0006Bd-73 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:27:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36082 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxy8P-0000Bm-Np for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:27:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40027) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxy7p-0000AN-5X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:26:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxy7k-0004OX-SK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:26:53 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=46009 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dxy7k-0004Ne-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:26:48 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dxy7a-0002y8-As for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:26:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:QSNpYhpt5YPLD9snSDMWc5AjBzg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:218910 Archived-At: On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:03:52 +0200 Dmitry Gutov wrote: DG> On 9/29/17 4:55 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> Right now the logic is based on buffer visibility, I think. next-error >> supposed to be DWIM so the complexity is on the software side (and >> messy) to keep the user experience simple. For me, it Just Works >> currently (I use Occur and Flycheck a lot, compile and grep/git grep >> less) so I've been pretty happy with it. I'm sure it can be improved :) DG> See https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=20489 for a recent discussion. I was specifically talking about how Flymake should integrate with next-error. Sorry I didn't make that clearer. I'm not sure if you want to follow up on that bug or here in a new thread, but if you want to make a branch with the changes you think would improve the next-error DWIM experience, I'll be glad to take a look and test it with my workflows. That would probably be the most effective way. Ted