From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joaotavora@gmail.com (=?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Flymake rewrite in emacs-26 Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 18:03:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87y3oj7x60.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8760bwz5qf.fsf@gmail.com> <83infw1dkz.fsf@gnu.org> <87efqbb35x.fsf@gmail.com> <831smbqe70.fsf@gnu.org> <87tvz79h0s.fsf@gmail.com> <83wp43ov7s.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmlf9dh3.fsf@gmail.com> <83tvz7ot1o.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507655051 734 195.159.176.226 (10 Oct 2017 17:04:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:04:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cc: mvoteiza@udel.edu, lele@metapensiero.it, sdl.web@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 10 19:04:03 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xwj-0007Lj-Fj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:03:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36145 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xwq-0005uC-K0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:04:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43523) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xwE-0005tt-JQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:03:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xwB-0002Qq-GY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:03:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:56817) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e1xwB-0002QM-Ag; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 13:03:23 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l68so7239306wmd.5; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:03:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xPWtiffRxDoJVdpUh3IYRzu+7w7TtJjQ23/1W183EEA=; b=p++F1VLiu2nSjWlyE/mNHjEScrCMh27FfQR6zF0A5/Eqc0ZBsHHH8p2zvYpcdG7K4L ya4AiI6EFECxPiillUi2tjmSgCKgErqy9jQ9Q0KuYbeD1P/QTCLhSeR3OqUCe7u1qyZE HOqA2P5Q/B3TKkG65JF6E03UsXC+friTf/PfFkIwLHMfdJw3ahfhnTBMv6mnMl5Zpmxa lXNm16P3lpb5oPWz9/+yRd6PUEZI9mKFrj+BWkNYap70i3KUeSEsTHQSupYxP60xdptq B8FWl8yctH9tvQFU2rAquhxPbUHZBl/1ACBPxIs6IoNh7O9p8ekGuxzs9biOur4l0TZT lKYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xPWtiffRxDoJVdpUh3IYRzu+7w7TtJjQ23/1W183EEA=; b=PujUydPnQ2NP6dtNL6l0BxkEBCDYqybGIlrGpsLUszETF0zaPTycA8s/Mm+IqlfUmm tfp4QlMhvsG40zvQqwzZyFPsIor93um3THojU5wVU541D+YFzfAj5oAb8Bsf1vJjR/bN YyyybbXPaUem/154Sxr9lHFzemHf5p5xuIdhX+BSd7k/uvPZ+QRCjBCAhrZLWR99E9ai wbR5kU1xSFMZfAnBUTb2SUqZ0S1kbZ3mFIFOCYnScuKZTSNAowjPhfP3KFjt89ua9dnB sXdfcAdlH6cuRbWw/HBUvWwQwrhyarpwmKdn8QZLt5EgycFqS4xog+mJafWW25dndrIk ZTnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUuUNsKw8HMWt/5PV9Y3UCMnUPwJk+2ifIdaevQGveR9CzdN0fT VF6/eLbFBoSQJlVQYld+4+4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QCDtTlyHGfS9VSaZ+oApcz0Lu57SMse+MSfwMv+XTCXHrVkJIf5mrpNW7B8INZASFqjOlNfdQ== X-Received: by 10.28.215.4 with SMTP id o4mr10996687wmg.0.1507655002102; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from lolita.yourcompany.com ([194.117.2.109]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m19sm6686682wma.24.2017.10.10.10.03.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 10 Oct 2017 10:03:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83tvz7ot1o.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 10 Oct 2017 19:40:19 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::234 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219350 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: joaotavora@gmail.com (Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora) >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, sdl.web@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, >> Mark Oteiza , Lele Gaifax >> Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 17:25:44 +0100 >>=20 >> > I think yes. >>=20 >> OK, IIUC we have copyright assignments for every author besides me > > If you are unsure, I can check. No need I think (Lele Gaifax and Marl Oteiza are two contributors involved) > Most of the flags we use are for flagging dubious or erroneous code, > they should not matter, I think. I think it=E2=80=99s useful to have Flymake synchronized with these flags, = so that you are notified visually of these problems ahead of a "real" compilation. FWIW this is what the Emacs Lisp backend already does for Emacs Lisp sources. > What compiler flags must be set for Flycheck to work reasonably well > with a program's sources? I guess the -I flags, but what else? For "reasonable" operation, it=E2=80=99s mostly the -I flags, and maybe some essential -D flags (In Emacs=E2=80=99s case -Demacs, I think). > (I have never used Flymake, so my questions are ones of a layman in Fittingly, this is what a sufficiently smart GCC backend could help change.