From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-26 3fc05cf: Scripts to automate windows binary distribution Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:08:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87y3nzgt9q.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <20171024173456.23065.52677@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171024173457.C45BE2031F@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87r2trg01m.fsf@gmx.de> <874lqntyfu.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87lgjzfs6c.fsf@gmx.de> <83o9ov8ez3.fsf@gnu.org> <87inf3l1cm.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1508944144 15573 195.159.176.226 (25 Oct 2017 15:09:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2017 15:09:04 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 25 17:08:55 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7NIR-0001sg-VT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:08:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48735 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7NIZ-0006Gu-8H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:08:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56734) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7NIO-0006Gm-Qp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:08:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7NIK-0008Qt-Tz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:08:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=48658 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e7NIK-0008Nh-MS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 11:08:36 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e7NHv-00079q-GW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2017 17:08:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:K8x/TKyhlJcWrMLdMcPrHaGDmG8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219754 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > >> I don't see a problem to have scripts in Python under admin/. That >> stuff is not for the users, it's mainly for Emacs maintainers, so the >> tools it requires are less important. > > Could we document, which languages are accepted there? Let's start with > Bash (or any POSIX shell), Guile, Perl, Python. Otherwise, somebody > might contribute Lua scripts, or whatever. What's wrong with Lua? :-) IMHO, on this case, where a maintainer just puts on the repo the scripts he wrote for his tasks, it is ok to accept the language that the contributor decides. If those scripts where meant for users, then indeed we should decide what's more convenient.