From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34588: 27.0.50; Doc of write-contents-functions: arguments? Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 05:24:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87y369ydil.fsf@web.de> References: <87bm3715bu.fsf@web.de> <83y36agz88.fsf@gnu.org> <837edthkfd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="243554"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rms@gnu.org, 34588@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 21 05:26:28 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gwfwI-0011Cg-KS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 05:26:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54231 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwfwF-0004mz-CV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:26:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwfw6-0004mt-Pc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:26:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwfw4-0004tl-5x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:26:14 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwfvu-0004pt-4N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:26:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwfvt-0002Rj-S9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:26:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 04:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34588 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34588.15507231039325 (code B ref 34588); Thu, 21 Feb 2019 04:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Feb 2019 04:25:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58894 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwfuw-0002QK-I5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.17.12]:51089) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gwfuu-0002Pm-DV for 34588@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 23:25:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1550723093; bh=241J7ksEb5P64mYGKm3XkmvnLuXMYONRxlyG5bX5D3c=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QMHGEPPkYpzcK37JDJM7q4UnCtKT6a2DV2R3x5s9Rslp1rXyz3Dg3L3KM4nV9tG8D XY3BHqOkZQo0KpuOqFZL9c/8reex4VfoVBX29V7z33HwhBK6qpkW9oHcZOQM7ZASll TqgSDmjXAqNIkYq5l/zyjSpCcsRSEZu9+gObFDJA= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([88.67.111.211]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb103 [213.165.67.124]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LcgVn-1hLoGY022Z-00k7tI; Thu, 21 Feb 2019 05:24:53 +0100 In-Reply-To: <837edthkfd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2019 05:47:34 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:0Q7fhIcG7LnUZ0E8/EKiVZbwbhLD8LqCfJy3icODKaqjNVN0lzo f1GlaibXyNhVr3P/vCPuWo03oAucqThiMPgaMXyK/slPvZFbzTlUFOY9ZhqCkwZqpO6ABLi RxyK9G2RlE+tLKjLmThg+X5sl8GQxS8qde3rMIoOcUiYGRQ10pv7YjpXf3L86hVZbV7QEHj BWPy46BaPQa1N0krPERgw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:jo4teB7qZh8=:3Y2nn4Rkbu3inguYkAHH8/ S8DGQMJKMnoidpeGJEal3dg5OKohCMqzexHm47zmNpZwxSs1YmrLplOJBJa4uqaJOWv3HB8iK J69Q046e4IcXpNabDg6VD6l98CSRTBBGgycF9Zn92m7th1vwQNz0HB864Z0mPe26c3dPthS1l qwIOd4nrHNMfCHVxXvvGL6+eisXAtpOYWnKQ7mTrvCaG3Q3XRUZMKtk0trlbVc93P0Hs2LPkj 1KrrbOHIW4rSUT1Ac+ebYO82lytLhhl+pPKwAXlcCCl+GFeckkRiATMrL+BIuQifCRN0xiZro pLQR/lhJg9bfq36/mXhcyXJRrD1+zCIQI3a37PORVE+1fM483EiDG8V4z9+6uIqHd/0bFONmN YTMPnV0Y/JVJbfmKxG0+kk7c2ujRRFTfcewWUwF1NLCbDJWUlbtQhl3cat1eFOCymSz//Mxh4 pytGeood4Q+AC5gU79ZgiZBoockLEIuR85Zw6gxlia1tf9UJbaOgCp1T9YoPK4jv9fUsfJ/Ie mbp6+iq1DWuI1iaVtCnlA1UEdD50wyAVKlyElk+NzEDOBV6ym8uhNGA7r4L6U7IDh1BDjRkaH 2Pr4KH6cYH34aCG0I8Ss0/RXg0tPNV4LsHGA1yXMXFigX7mC5fKCEN2zPJpF3d2x3P6AsDMgG gYhE+5KMsH7Wo57f96oJ3lb6crOfsi9is5ABeTWIbGpzgU6vGl+sirKM2ePcVuC19+JkG0bBC VVTBU7k1uKBO5amfwTK7AZPjFwYovKlNxrUrMTSFVZMecrzFY3vkaPfYIIjkFNDvg+bVnozk X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:155611 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > From: Richard Stallman > > Cc: michael_heerdegen@web.de, 34588@debbugs.gnu.org > > Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 22:32:08 -0500 > > > > > Because we need to call those functions with > > > run-hook-with-args-until-success, I guess. > > > > This naming convention should be documented in the Emacs Lisp > > Reference Manual. > > It is, but this case goes against the convention, thus Michael's > question. Maybe Richard meant we should document that something should _not_ be called "-hook" when it is called with `run-hook-with-args-until-success'? That _would_ have answered my question, and stating that as a convention would make sense to me. Michael.