From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus-bug Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:49:52 -0700 Message-ID: <87y33rfnf3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87o94nyf4k.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <8736lzabfj.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7g78vcg.fsf@tcd.ie> <83ftpzse8r.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="268035"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: "Basil L. Contovounesios" , tsdh@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 30 19:12:03 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hLWIU-0017Zm-PX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 19:12:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50442 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLWIT-0001Pj-LQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39265) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLW2M-0004E1-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:55:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLVxA-0006kv-6y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:50:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ericabrahamsen.net ([52.70.2.18]:39408 helo=mail.ericabrahamsen.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hLVx8-0006iF-Sm; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:49:58 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (97-113-61-17.tukw.qwest.net [97.113.61.17]) (Authenticated sender: eric@ericabrahamsen.net) by mail.ericabrahamsen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DA0EFA027; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:49:56 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83ftpzse8r.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:29:40 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 52.70.2.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236058 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" >> Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:40:31 +0100 >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> >> The former is more useful for bug search and triage purposes, but the >> latter includes more information about Emacs' state, so I think TRT >> would be to make gnus-bug exactly like report-emacs-bug, except that it >> also assigns the bug to the gnus package. > > I agree. There was some talk a while ago about having `report-emacs-bug' prompt for an optional sub-package (Gnus, Tramp, ERC, etc), and "do something extra": add a tag, cc a maintainer, something like that. I still think that's a good idea.