From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Bug statistics Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:38:05 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2xep3jm.fsf@gnus.org> References: <83lftf43hy.fsf@gnu.org> <877e4zdvgx.fsf@gnus.org> <83ftjm4o74.fsf@gnu.org> <877e4ymugu.fsf@gmx.de> <877e4yqmf9.fsf@gnus.org> <878spegqbv.fsf@gmx.de> <8736fmqk3x.fsf@gnus.org> <874l02gp0q.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="217672"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 21 16:48:00 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMYyT-000uNg-0z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:47:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43394 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMYyQ-0006ki-Sb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:47:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iMYp2-0008R7-J4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:38:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMYp0-00058y-CJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:38:12 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:40544) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iMYp0-00058N-5R; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 10:38:10 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iMYov-00014G-Bm; Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:38:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874l02gp0q.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 21 Oct 2019 16:19:01 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.231.51 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:241313 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > In debbugs.el, both found_date and fixed_date are documented. Plus the > comment "(empty for now)". I don't remember why I have written that, but > it looks like Debbugs::SOAP does not return these field values. > > Would need to dig into the Perl sources. Let's see, whether I find > something. > > Additionally, I will ask upstream. Great! But I wonder... fixed_date is one thing, but you can close a bug without marking it as fixed. Is there a separate date for the "close" action somewhere in the database? For instance, https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18688 was closed without being marked as "fixed". -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no