From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Bernoulli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Regarding outline headings in emacs-lisp libraries Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:41:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87y2n3oiyg.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <875zalolt7.fsf@bernoul.li> <87v9ikmmly.fsf@bernoul.li> <87imeal72x.fsf@bernoul.li> <87ft9el2bl.fsf@bernoul.li> <83a6zmgl0p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6849"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 28 15:44:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k0Pu3-0001fY-Nb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:44:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55958 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0Pu2-0005Ay-GQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46028) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0PrR-0003l4-5b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:41:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:51436) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0PrP-0002rS-BO; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 09:41:40 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10E1165C3; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:41:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail0.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id tBplGMuKDA5c; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:41:33 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72B87165C1; Tue, 28 Jul 2020 15:41:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/28 09:41:33 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:253297 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> But after the proposed changes, almost none of the code will be under >> "Code:", so the name will be a misnomer, no? > > Could be. But that's a very minor cosmetic problem, AFAIC, and none of > the suggested replacements for it sound particularly useful/enlightening > either. Which is why I wrote that "renaming it would provide very > little concrete benefits". > > The costs/downsides of a rename are much more immediately apparent OTOH. So does that mean that you approve of my first variant of the updated description? And Eli, are you okay with sticking to "Code:"? I have two minor copy edits so far: - s/that use/that you use/ - s/anyway././ Did you spot anything else? Jonas