From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?K=C3=A9vin_Le_Gouguec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concern about new binding. Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:08:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87y2g5smya.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo.ref@Ergus> <20210202134950.vybbpf3iewbymfjo@Ergus> <87zh0mmr54.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12889"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: spacibba@aol.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 03 07:08:54 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l7BLR-0003Fc-V6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 07:08:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56592 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7BLR-0001SS-0J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 01:08:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48076) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7BKt-000130-71 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 01:08:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::436]:46313) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l7BKr-0007Oj-Gf; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 01:08:18 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id q7so22789148wre.13; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 22:08:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=VoDhagjMbplrbn0e5LTGgyx9M2mfwpITCPwJbsOyc04=; b=XUQFOfWmx1Q0Odrz5XIzCAllCQcvi5mV4RQmEEzGdCsFNviHP6nrQ72Rx2oCg7hRSM cm3AH6XOwYsIgFW2Hn3gPMSYbx46JotN3hIQd8ABTSC59tuxsgv31//QGPcAM12JK9Wg ut5j3bQZxqgVkKFnmg28cZODGF+tyGBZuoG68itcrCMV9zPcAiOYhB7N1rJGO/ETbWKc /Dqc8LFrhEBwbx7ixEQc/LY4yifAbNabtFlsb2PM0Tikv1QtnviKYPr5Yq5K7Usa1bUr tUI9jtvV1oWIESUnUGW3orCfViOAAq3cB8XEOEjy55/6hziuuowYlISnywSRpH3hFcgY yq8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=VoDhagjMbplrbn0e5LTGgyx9M2mfwpITCPwJbsOyc04=; b=m3E116A1zQ7Xsv2Kk9kp7PU0S26J6KhnUxi1l7ICueJLgPiTqOB9dpYsPjiSWYD8+P 9i3STNTgNxZ/Tw+fjgvA1u8gya/k0XEaqm4hFInYmeERcyTOiePvOMNhW462wJpuv0yf u1qDgXEr8zTL3jCJnWl+bkF3dJ9oH7vc2d4phAoFmdcSJbDtV7v1PPANx2gBTp4EXB6n ns1JrVpHBPInRDjpRZlLPEvo3GFZo2cHEnua0YJp0SbMhU/7x/1eXZL544DT0SYRVyVr KecQ6JfWe5cAcjmpwq6O114ZcQ2NpqevG6rOd2Oh0UtMEf3J9aq2O1BZNiL81yoDoKgE g23w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303h4UnjGfqKsT0olIvJRK03Tp7OhZNdA0skYxVGnjwQRVXJRXU d6Z0siTCUS2ZI6kORcIxFmytlTMDxQPuXA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbSUcJ7wd80RSrYzohzOYDDsUU6Osp5SmsUG7SEA52uomIcAPhAENsqDxZY4YncrQ7VhmYag== X-Received: by 2002:adf:decb:: with SMTP id i11mr1537766wrn.78.1612332495280; Tue, 02 Feb 2021 22:08:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from my-little-tumbleweed ([2a01:e0a:20e:d340:922b:34ff:fe95:9aed]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g194sm1124258wme.39.2021.02.02.22.08.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 02 Feb 2021 22:08:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 03 Feb 2021 00:52:12 -0500") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::436; envelope-from=kevin.legouguec@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x436.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:263777 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > > See bug#46151. > > > IIUC the initial request was to have a way to revert shell output > > buffers; somewhere along the way the usefulness of a global binding for > > revert-buffer was brought up, various options were discussed, a decision > > was taken, and here we are. > > Did that discussion happen entirely within that bug thread? I do not remember seeing any message on emacs-devel about this topic before Ergus started this thread.